<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 02/13/2016 10:41 AM, Dave Täht
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:56BF78C2.1050108@taht.net" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I have an increasing desire to build (or buy if one exists) a couple
boxes that can "aircap" packet capture across as many bands as possible,
in these locations (and elsewhere, if people here are interested)
</pre>
</blockquote>
I've started evaluating a 2U with 6 ath10k nics for multiple channel
capture using airodump or tcpdump. Metageek's Eye P.A. tool is
fairly useful in visualizing things like air time usage and retry
rates, but I'm still on the fence as to whether Wireshark's built-in
analysis tools are good enough for generating meaningful
comparisons.<br>
<br>
<img alt="inside" src="cid:part1.04040602.08080601@candelatech.com"
height="320" width="240"> <img alt="outside"
src="cid:part2.07010300.00040501@candelatech.com" height="320"
width="240"><br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:56BF78C2.1050108@taht.net" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
I look to candelatech to get an attenuator and load generator.
I think the sdr-based wifi torpedo looks good, can't remember the link.
There is a growing need to be able to tear apart those aircaps
statistically also, in particular retransmits and packet loss patterns.
And, possibly delusionally, I keep thinking getting a lte capable dongle
or mini-pcie card would be good too. Sierra wireless? What?
_______________________________________________
Make-wifi-fast mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net">Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast">https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>