<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>Are you using the dual-dsthost and dual-srchost options? If so,
try removing those settings from SQM and uncheck all the
checkboxes you selected to reach them.</p>
<p>Then try a test on Ethernet with SQM on.<br>
</p>
<p>Noah<br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/2/2016 1:14 PM, Jon Pike wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CALukJKQztV3-_8FNsEKtXtWb5a12sZrUZTMmOnLX8MGwk6MpjQ@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Hello all... <br>
<br>
</div>
<div>Well, with medical issues, and having a busy week, I
didn't get back right away. Here's the DSLReports Speedtest
runs I took.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>My results here are pretty variable, so I don't know how
trustworthy they are or how worth while to you guys, vs
FLENT runs. <br>
</div>
<div>The lower block is using Toke's 11-18 C7 FW build, the
upper block is with the 11-24 build.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>Upshot, on my Archer C7, both ran for days with no
apparent issues, on my home network. Interesting note, I
ran both the C7 v2 and the C7 v3, both ran fine. So, if you
end up with a v3, it shouldn't be an issue. Further side
note, the different configuration of the v3 model, with both
2.4Ghz and 5Ghz on the external "rabbit ears" antennas, seems
to have a bit stronger signal on 2.4Ghz on the other end of my
house, than the v2 model that has 3 separate, small 2.4Ghz
antennas inside the box. Caveat, my testing of that wasn't
very thourough..<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>My overall home network setup is: Cox cable - SB6146 modem
- Archer C7 router - various clients. I did testing on a PC
plugged directely in a eth port of the C7, to PC's using
Netgear Netgear WNA3100 N300, and A6200 AC1200 USB adapters.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Below are the links to DSLReports, on the tests. Most
have cake, and piece of cake, and Noah's suggested settings,
with speed caps of 55 and 5 mbit. My cable is supposed to be
60/6, I see 65 often, with wild speed variation on the UL,
settling to 5-6mbits.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>I have the Speedtest settings set for hi res bufferbloat,
test time extended to 20sec, which is about as long as you can
go without pushing the start of the test off the end of that
graph.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>Let me know if this is in any way useful, or what I can do
to make it more worth looking at. It seems so variable and
random, that I wonder about the worth, as well as you don't
get a good look at what the latencey is over time, vs FLENT.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
-------------------------------------------<br>
eth0 to router - no SQM<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6656688">http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6656688</a>
Starts near 60, plateau 64-65 (hits 66) then drops to 52-54 at
the 10sec mark. UL hits 18, before falling down to a 4.5-5.5
average Bloat C<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6657058">http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6657058</a>
very similar, but bloat an A this time<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6657916">http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6657916</a>
" Bloat a C this time<br>
<br>
<br>
now C7 V2, with Toke 11-24 FW SQM 55/5<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6659367">http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6659367</a>
51.2 1.65, bloat B<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6659493">http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6659493</a>
52.4 3.01 bloat A peak of 300-400ms on all including idle?<br>
<br>
--------------------------------<br>
</div>
Earlier tests with Toke's 11-18 FW, SQM 55/5 mbits<br>
<div><br>
2.4Ghz N adapter Netgear WNA3100 N300 adapter<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6440808">http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6440808</a><br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6440846">http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6440846</a><br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6440864">http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6440864</a><br>
<br>
<br>
2.4Ghz AC adapter Netgear A6200 AC1200 adapter<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6440940">http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6440940</a><br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6440963">http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6440963</a><br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6440987">http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6440987</a><br>
<br>
5Ghz AC adapter Netgear A6200 AC1200 adapter<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6441015">http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6441015</a><br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6441038">http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6441038</a><br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6441056">http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6441056</a><br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6441132">http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6441132</a>
(first A grade of the batch)<br>
<br>
eth1 to C7<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6441483">http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6441483</a><br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6441570">http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6441570</a><br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6441586">http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6441586</a><br>
<br>
<br>
---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>
From: Jon Pike <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:jonpike54@gmail.com">jonpike54@gmail.com</a>><br>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:toke@toke.dk">toke@toke.dk</a>><br>
Cc: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net">make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net</a><br>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 21:58:46 -0800<br>
Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Updated LEDE build with airtime
patches<br>
<p dir="ltr">Wish I wasn't out of town still... I could have
got some time with the new one. Had been running the 11-18
build version of yours, on a C7 v2 in my mixed home network
enviroment. N devices, AC devices, a semi rogue N range
extender, all running WPA2-AES.</p>
<p dir="ltr">I did see some occasional large amounts of
bloat, most of the time good behavior. Occasional odd,
regular thru put drops to 1/4 speed. I mentioned this in
earlier posts, have done some more detailed testing since,
that's at home and unavailable till I'm home again. You
could see a few DSLReports logs in my posts.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Hope that helps...</p>
<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Make-wifi-fast mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net">Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast">https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>