<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>My Archer C7 v2 says Qualcomm Atheros QCA9880.<br>
<br>
I checked using iperf3, and it says about 40 mbps.<br>
<br>
I remember getting at least 70mbps.</p>
<p> I copied Toke's patch to a new build about a month ago, when I
redid my WiFi. Maybe it broke some time ago.</p>
<p>I had been using up to date versions of that patch for months.<br>
</p>
<p>Noah<br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/11/2017 4:12 PM, Jon Pike wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CALukJKTxU8fq6-GCe8+4Wwq6DLwqEyU_pWNyUasTLqOnkU+C0Q@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="auto">Hmmm, again...
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">
<div dir="auto"
style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:16.64px">Doesn't the
C7 have the QCA9880? Noah, what kind of speed do you get
on yours?</div>
<div dir="auto"
style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:16.64px"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"
style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:16.64px">I just
checked the OpenWRT hardware page... Seems it does.
Checked the C2600, it says it does, but not which dash
number version of the chip, if that makes any difference.</div>
<div dir="auto"
style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:16.64px"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"
style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:16.64px">I would
have guessed that if you only got 4-6Mbit on it, you
wouldn't consider it working, really... so interested in
hearing if Noah is seeing normal speeds somehow.</div>
<div dir="auto"
style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:16.64px"><br>
---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>
From: Adrian Popescu <<a
href="mailto:adriannnpopescu@gmail.com?src=inbox"
style="color:rgb(51,103,214)" moz-do-not-send="true">adriannnpopescu@gmail.com</a>?<br>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <<a
href="mailto:toke@toke.dk?src=inbox"
style="color:rgb(51,103,214)" moz-do-not-send="true">toke@toke.dk</a>><br>
Cc: Jon Pike <<a
href="mailto:jonpike54@gmail.com?src=inbox"
style="color:rgb(51,103,214)" moz-do-not-send="true">jonpike54@gmail.com</a>>, <a
href="mailto:make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net?src=inbox"
style="color:rgb(51,103,214)" moz-do-not-send="true">make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferblo<wbr>at.net</a><br>
Bcc: <br>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 15:30:47 +0300<br>
Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Make-wifi-fast Digest, Vol 29,
Issue 1<br>
We need to put some pressure on QCA to add push-pull support
to the<br>
firmware. This is MU-MIMO capable hardware which should be
able to<br>
handle push-pull without breaking a sweat.<br>
<br>
I have tested this on a brand new Archer C2600.<br>
<br>
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <<a
href="mailto:toke@toke.dk?src=inbox"
style="color:rgb(51,103,214)" moz-do-not-send="true">toke@toke.dk</a>>
wrote:<br>
> Adrian Popescu <<a
href="mailto:adriannnpopescu@gmail.com?src=inbox"
style="color:rgb(51,103,214)" moz-do-not-send="true">adriannnpopescu@gmail.com</a>>
writes:<br>
><br>
>> QCA9980 gets 2-6 Mbps with this patch. I was able
to get up to 400-500<br>
>> Mbps without the patch.<br>
>><br>
>> The QCA9980 firmware doesn't have push-pull
support.<br>
><br>
> Ah, bugger. Guess we'll have to drop it, then. Which
device is this in?<br>
><br>
> -Toke<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>
From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <<a
href="mailto:toke@toke.dk?src=inbox"
style="color:rgb(51,103,214)" moz-do-not-send="true">toke@toke.dk</a>><br>
To: Adrian Popescu <<a
href="mailto:adriannnpopescu@gmail.com?src=inbox"
style="color:rgb(51,103,214)" moz-do-not-send="true">adriannnpopescu@gmail.com</a>><br>
Cc: Jon Pike <<a
href="mailto:jonpike54@gmail.com?src=inbox"
style="color:rgb(51,103,214)" moz-do-not-send="true">jonpike54@gmail.com</a>>, <a
href="mailto:make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net?src=inbox"
style="color:rgb(51,103,214)" moz-do-not-send="true">make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferblo<wbr>at.net</a><br>
Bcc: <br>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 14:34:21 +0200<br>
Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] Make-wifi-fast Digest, Vol 29,
Issue 1<br>
Adrian Popescu <<a
href="mailto:adriannnpopescu@gmail.com?src=inbox"
style="color:rgb(51,103,214)" moz-do-not-send="true">adriannnpopescu@gmail.com</a>>
writes:<br>
<br>
> We need to put some pressure on QCA to add push-pull
support to the<br>
> firmware. This is MU-MIMO capable hardware which should
be able to<br>
> handle push-pull without breaking a sweat.<br>
><br>
> I have tested this on a brand new Archer C2600.<br>
<br>
There's new hardware shipping without this feature? WTF?<br>
<br>
Putting pressure on QCA is all well and good, but
unfortunately it's not<br>
something we've had a lot of luck with so far :/<br>
<br>
-Toke<br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Make-wifi-fast mailing list<br>
<a
href="mailto:Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net?src=inbox"
style="color:rgb(51,103,214)" moz-do-not-send="true">Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferblo<wbr>at.net</a><br>
<a
href="https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast"
style="color:rgb(51,103,214)" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.bufferbloat.net/<wbr>listinfo/make-wifi-fast</a></div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Make-wifi-fast mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net">Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast">https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>