[NNagain] The non-death of DSL
rjmcmahon
rjmcmahon at rjmcmahon.com
Sat Oct 7 18:13:07 EDT 2023
Everybody abandoned my local loop. Twisted pair from multiple decades
ago into antiquated, windowless COs with punch blocks, with no space nor
latency advantage for colocated content & compute, seems to have killed
it off. I suspect in some towns one can buy out the local loop copper
with just a promise of maintenance. The whole CLEC open the loop to
competitive access seems to have failed per costs, antiquated
technology, limited colocation, an outdated waveguide (otherwise things
like CDDI would have won over Cat 5), and market reasons. The early ISPs
didn't collocate, they bought T1s and E1s and connected the TDM to
statistical multiplexing - no major investment there either.
The RBOCs, SBC (now AT&T) & and VZ went to contract carriage and
wireless largely because of the burdens of title II per regulators not
being able to create an investment into the OSPs. The 2000 blow up was
kinda real.
She starts out by complaining about trying to place her WiFi in the
right place. That's like trying to share a flashlight. She has access to
the FCC technology group full of capable engineers. They should have
told her to install some structured wire, place more APs, set the
carrier and turn down the power. My wife works in the garden now using
the garden AP SSID with no issues. My daughter got her own carrier too
per here Dad dedicating a front end module for her distance learning
needs. I think her story to justify title II regulation is a bit made
up.
Also, communications have been essential back before the rural free
delivery of mail in 1896. Nothing new here other than hyperbole to
justify a 5 member commission acting as the single federal regulator
over 140M households and 33M businesses, almost none of which have any
idea about the complexities of the internet. I'm not buying it and don't
want to hand the keys to the FCC who couldn't protect journalism nor
privacy. Maybe start there, looking at what they didn't do versus
blaming contract carriage for a distraction?
https://about.usps.com/who/profile/history/rural-free-delivery.htm#:~:text=On%20October%201%2C%201896%2C%20rural,were%20operating%20in%2029%20states.
Bob
> My understanding, though I am not 100% certain, is that the baby bells
> lobbied to have the CLEC equal access provisions revoked/gutted.
> Before this, the telephone companies were required to provide access
> to the "last mile" of the copper lines and the switches at wholesale
> costs. Once the equal access provisions were removed, the telephone
> companies started charging the small phone and DSL providers close to
> the retail price for access. The CLEC DSL providers could not stay in
> business when they charged a customer $35 / month for Internet service
> while the telephone company charged the DSL ISP $35 / month for
> access.
>
>
>
>
> ---- On Sat, 07 Oct 2023 17:22:10 -0400 Dave Taht via Nnagain wrote
> ---
> > I have a lot to unpack from this:
> >
> > https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-397257A1.pdf
> >
> > the first two on my mind from 2005 are: "FCC adopted its first open
> > internet policy" and "Competitiveness" As best as I recall, (and
> > please correct me), this led essentially to the departure of all the
> > 3rd party DSL providers from the field. I had found something
> > referencing this interpretation that I cannot find right now, but I
> do
> > clearly remember all the DSL services you could buy from in the
> early
> > 00s, and how few you can buy from now. Obviously there are many
> other
> > possible root causes.
> >
> > DSL continued to get better and evolve, but it definately suffers
> from
> > many reports of degraded copper quality, but does an estimate exist
> > for how much working DSL is left?
> >
> > Q0) How much DSL is in the EU?
> > Q1) How much DSL is left in the USA?
> > Q2) What form is it? (VDSL, etc?)
> >
> > Did competition in DSL vanish because of or not of an FCC related
> order?
> >
> > --
> > Oct 30:
> https://netdevconf.info/0x17/news/the-maestro-and-the-music-bof.html
> > Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nnagain mailing list
> > Nnagain at lists.bufferbloat.net
> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Nnagain mailing list
> Nnagain at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain
More information about the Nnagain
mailing list