[NNagain] NN review in the UK

[Mike Conlow]

+1. My understanding is the origins of this item in the NN review in the UK
is that  ISPs requested it because of lack of clarity around whether
"premium quality service" offerings violated NN rules. See page 63-64 here
<https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0028/245926/net-neutrality-review.pdf>.
Screenshot below:

[image: Screenshot 2023-10-30 at 11.08.48 AM.png]

On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 10:26 AM Livingood, Jason via Nnagain <
nnagain at lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:

> On 10/28/23, 06:01, "Nnagain on behalf of Sebastian Moeller via Nnagain"
> <nnagain-
> > For example, people who use high quality virtual reality applications
> may want to buy a premium quality service, while users who mainly stream
> and browse the internet can buy a cheaper package. Our updated guidance
> clarifies that ISPs can offer premium packages, for example offering low
> latency, as long as they are sufficiently clear to customers about what
> they can expect from the services they buy.
>
> Sigh. Wish more regulators knew about modern AQMs - we can have our cake
> and eat it too. The solution above seems to pre-suppose the need for QoS
> but this isn't a capacity problem.
>
> JL
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nnagain mailing list
> Nnagain at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/nnagain/attachments/20231030/ddca688d/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screenshot 2023-10-30 at 11.08.48 AM.png
Type: image/png
Size: 230726 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/nnagain/attachments/20231030/ddca688d/attachment-0001.png>