[NNagain] ntia explicitly excludes latency under load from bead measurements

[Eugene Chang]

What do the engineers working for the FCC think about this?
I assume there are engineers supporting the commissioners?
Does anyone here know the engineers?

Gene
----------------------------------------------
Eugene Chang,
eugene.chang at ieee.org
m 781-799-0233 (in Honolulu)

On Dec 9, 2024, at 7:46 AM, Frantisek Borsik via Nnagain <nnagain at lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:

Are they retarded, or what? LOL


All the best,

Frank
Frantisek (Frank) Borsik

https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik
Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: +421919416714
iMessage, mobile: +420775230885
Skype: casioa5302ca
frantisek.borsik at gmail.com<mailto:frantisek.borsik at gmail.com>


On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 6:42 PM Dave Taht via Nnagain <nnagain at lists.bufferbloat.net<mailto:nnagain at lists.bufferbloat.net>> wrote:
from:

https://www.ntia.gov/sites/default/files/2024-12/draft_performance_measures_for_bead_last-mile_networks_policy_notice.pdf

"For latency testing, a provider must conduct a minimum of one test
per minute — 60 tests per hour — for each testing hour. If the
consumer load during a latency test exceeds 200,000 bits per second
downstream,26 the provider may cancel the test and reevaluate whether
the consumer load exceeds 200,000 bits per second downstream before
retrying the test in the next minute."

w/a 100ms baseline. Hilarious. Sad.

--
Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
_______________________________________________
Nnagain mailing list
Nnagain at lists.bufferbloat.net<mailto:Nnagain at lists.bufferbloat.net>
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain
_______________________________________________
Nnagain mailing list
Nnagain at lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/nnagain/attachments/20241209/767a3c50/attachment.html>