[NNagain] FCC - delete, delete, delete

Richard Roy dickroy at alum.mit.edu
Wed Mar 12 20:00:38 EDT 2025


This administration is a total reflection of Musk's crash and burn philosophy evidenced by his cavalier approach to space flight.  This can be tolerated when lives and prosperity of millions of citizens are not at stake, however it's a disaster when they are.  Thinking the entire government can be run like Musk runs SpaceX is a recipe for "every man and woman for themselves" appearing at a theater near you very soon.  If you thought the "wild west of the 1880's" was interesting, just wait.  Instead of Winchesters, we have AK47's everywhere and enough ammunition to take out the entire population ... 10 times over.  Did you order yours yet?? 😊😊😊



As for "what the FCC can do", "dissolve itself" comes to mind. AFAIK, it's been over a decade since they have done anything helpful or useful for any American citizen who isn't the head of a major corporation. If you delete the entire organization, there will be no one around to enforce whatever regs are still on the books so who cares? ... and you'll save another few 10's of millions of dollars annually which will fit nicely in the pockets of the "good folks", aka FODT. 😊😊😊



RR



-----Original Message-----
From: Nnagain <nnagain-bounces at lists.bufferbloat.net> On Behalf Of Dave Taht via Nnagain
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2025 10:39 AM
To: Network Neutrality is back! LetΒ΄s make the technical aspects heard this time! <nnagain at lists.bufferbloat.net>
Cc: Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com>
Subject: [NNagain] FCC - delete, delete, delete



See: https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-25-219A1.pdf



... the Commission has opened a new docket, titled β€œIn re: Delete, Delete, Delete,” in which the agency seeks comment β€œon every rule, regulation, or guidance document that the FCC should eliminate for the purposes of alleviating unnecessary regulatory burdens.”



I don't have a big list (today!) of what I've found unnecessarily restrictive. I find many of the rules around ham radio and the internet pretty overly restrictive, and thought that the outdoor licensing system for wifi6 pretty painful (but that seems to be mostly resolved). Most of the stuff I care about seems to require more regulation not less (router security, deploying AQM and FQ technology). I wish it didn't.



My impression is that the FCC is not going to regain any authority over the internet more than they have and title II is dead. They might get spectrum authority back (which would be a good thing IMHO).



What oxes will get put up to be gored?



What programs need to be preserved?





--

Dave TΓ€ht CSO, LibreQoS

"A perfect storm" - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQX1PmRULU0

_______________________________________________

Nnagain mailing list

Nnagain at lists.bufferbloat.net<mailto:Nnagain at lists.bufferbloat.net>

https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/nnagain/attachments/20250313/c242ea08/attachment.html>


More information about the Nnagain mailing list