<html o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Wingdings;
panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoPlainText, li.MsoPlainText, div.MsoPlainText
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 77.95pt 1.0in 77.95pt;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
</head><body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="zoom: 0%;"><div dir="auto"><br><br></div>
<div dir="auto">What is DSRC?<br><br><br></div>
<div dir="auto">DSRC (Dedicated Short-Range Communications) is a wireless communication technology that enables vehicles to communicate with each other and other road users directly, without involving cellular or other infrastructure. DSRC is based on WiFi technology<br><br><br><br></div>
<div dir="auto"><!-- tmjah_g_1299s --><a href="https://auto-talks.com/technology/dsrc-technology/#:~:text=What%20is%20DSRC%3F,involving%20cellular%20or%20other%20infrastructure">https://auto-talks.com/technology/dsrc-technology/#:~:text=What%20is%20DSRC%3F,involving%20cellular%20or%20other%20infrastructure</a>.<!-- tmjah_g_1299e --></div>
<div class="gmail_quote" >On Mar 9, 2024, at 12:42 PM, Dick Roy via Nnagain <<a href="mailto:nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net" target="_blank">nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Section1">
<p class="MsoPlainText"><font size="2" face="Courier New"><span style="font-size: 10.0pt"></span></font></p><p><font size="2" face="Courier New"> </font></p><p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><font size="2" face="Courier New"><span style="font-size: 10.0pt"></span></font></p><p><font size="2" face="Courier New"> </font></p><p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><font size="2" face="Courier New"><span style="font-size: 10.0pt">…</span></font></p><p></p><p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><font size="2" color="black" face="Courier New"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;color:black"></span></font></p><p><font size="2" color="black" face="Courier New"> </font></p><p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><font size="2" face="Courier New"><span style="font-size: 10.0pt">As expected this technique is designed to allow exactly what NN was
designed to prohibit (treating packets differentially in the internet based on
economic considerations*)... this is IMHO why instead of calling a spade a
spade mobile carriers avoid describing this in a useful way, as it is exactly
about prioritisation... IMHO that will back fire, and a better avenue would be
to be open about what it enables and propose a method to restrict the potential
issues. E.g. (I am making this up on the fly, so it will likely not hold up to
any degree of scrutiny) by self limiting to never commit more than X% of a
cell's capacity to slicing, IFF the cell is used for normal end user service at
all. So admit that there is some trade-off here, limit the fall-out, and then
describe why we as a society should embrace that trade-off<span style="background:yellow">. I am a bit sceptical about the whole car 2 car
communication thing (that is cars talk to cars, not people n cars talk to
people on cars ;) ), but if a Carrier believes there is value in that for e.g.
accident avoidance, then tell how this requires the stricter network guarantees
that (only?) slicing can deliver.</span></span></font></p><p></p><p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><b><i><font size="2" color="black" face="Courier New"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;color:black;font-weight:bold;font-style:italic">[RR] V2X
communications for saving lives will NEVER go through ANY carrier’s
network in spite of what you hear. There is simply no way anyone is going to
pay to have BSMs broadcast 10 times a second to prevent accidents, and NO
CARRIER is going to give that capacity away for free, even if they had enough
to carry the traffic, which they do not by many orders of magnitude!!! More
importantly, the information being exchanged does NOT require a network to get
where it needs to go! The 5G hype you hear from various carriers and equipment
suppliers related to V2X communications is all powerpoint BS (to make
shareholders happy). And there is a ton of it out there! </span></font></i></b><b><i><font color="black" face="Wingdings"><span style="font-family:Wingdings;color:black; font-weight:bold;font-style:italic">JJ</span></font><font color="black"><span style="color:black"></span></font></i></b></p><p></p><p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><b><i><font size="2" color="black" face="Courier New"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;color:black;font-weight:bold;font-style:italic"></span></font></i></b></p><p><b><i><font size="2" color="black" face="Courier New"> </font></i></b></p><p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><font size="2" face="Courier New"><span style="font-size: 10.0pt">RR</span></font></p><p></p><p></p>
</div>
<pre class="blue"><hr><br>Nnagain mailing list<br>Nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net<br><a href="https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain">https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain</a><br></pre></blockquote></div></body></html>