[Rpm] [Bloat] Relentless congestion control for testing purposes
Matt Mathis
matt.mathis at gmail.com
Mon Oct 4 22:49:30 EDT 2021
Thanks,
--MM--
Evil is defined by mortals who think they know "The Truth" and use force to
apply it to others.
-------------------------------------------
Matt Mathis (Email is best)
Home & mobile: 412-654-7529 please leave a message if you must call.
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 11:02 AM Luigi Rizzo via Rpm <
rpm at lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 6:33 PM Bob McMahon <bob.mcmahon at broadcom.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > hmm, this looks interesting to a test & measurement guy. Can it be done
> with a setsockopt? I might want to add this as an iperf2 option,
> particularly if it's broadly available,
>
>
> I would be happy to submit it as one or two upstream patches --
> perhaps one to implement
> the basic "ignore_holes" + setsockopt(), and another mechanism (if
> there isn't one
> already) to override defaults sockopts on certain sockets.
>
> I do think we need more readily available testing tool,
>
> cheers
> luigi
> _______________________________________________
> Rpm mailing list
> Rpm at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/rpm
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/rpm/attachments/20211004/12d5c459/attachment.html>
More information about the Rpm
mailing list