[Rpm] Does RPM measurement *require* a valid SSL certificate

[Rich Brown]

> On Oct 13, 2021, at 3:45 PM, Randall Meyer <rrm at apple.com> wrote:
> 
> We could add a “—insecure/-k” switch as a feature enhancement to the CLI.

Or maybe just ignore the certificate. More options is worse, if you have to implement/explain/justify them. 

In the context of an RPM test, where there would be (max) dozens of SSL calculations per second, I suspect that the difference between a self-signed certificate and a "real one" would be negligible.

Thanks.

Rich
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/rpm/attachments/20211013/d474acf7/attachment.html>