[Rpm] [Bloat] [Starlink] [LibreQoS] the grinch meets cloudflare'schristmas present

[Luis A. Cornejo]

Well Reddit has many posts talking about noticeable performance increases
for Starlink. Here is a primetime run:

waveform:
https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=333f97c7-7cbd-406c-8d9a-9f850cb5de7d

cloudflare attached



On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 11:43 AM MORTON JR., AL <acmorton at att.com> wrote:

> Dave and Luis,
>
> Do you know if any of these tools are using ~random payloads, to defeat
> compression?
>
> UDPST has a CLI option:
> (m)    -X           Randomize datagram payload (else zeroes)
>
> When I used this option testing shipboard satellite access, download was
> about 115kbps.
>
> Al
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2023 11:12 AM
> > To: Luis A. Cornejo <luis.a.cornejo at gmail.com>
> > Cc: Jay Moran <jay at tp.org>; Cake List <cake at lists.bufferbloat.net>;
> IETF IPPM
> > WG <ippm at ietf.org>; MORTON JR., AL <acmorton at att.com>; Rpm
> > <rpm at lists.bufferbloat.net>; bloat <bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net>;
> > dickroy at alum.mit.edu; libreqos <libreqos at lists.bufferbloat.net>
> > Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Rpm] [Starlink] [LibreQoS] the grinch meets
> > cloudflare'schristmas present
> >
> > Either starlink has vastly improved, or the test is way off in this case.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/rpm/attachments/20230112/bf41a135/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Web capture_12-1-2023_212657_speed.cloudflare.com.jpeg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 181599 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/rpm/attachments/20230112/bf41a135/attachment-0001.jpeg>