[Rpm] [M-Lab-Discuss] The FCC 2024 Section 706 Report, GN Docket No. 22-270 is out!
rjmcmahon
rjmcmahon at rjmcmahon.com
Mon Feb 26 15:02:21 EST 2024
Thanks for sharing this. I'm trying to find out what are the key metrics
that will be used for this monitoring. I want to make sure iperf 2 can
cover the technical, traffic related ones that make sense to a skilled
network operator, including a WiFi BSS manager. I didn't read all 327
pages though, from what I did read, I didn't see anything obvious. I
assume these types of KPIs may be in reference docs or something.
Thanks in advance for any help on this.
Bob
> And...
>
> Our bufferbloat.net submittal was cited multiple times! Thank you all
> for participating in that process!
>
> https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-400675A1.pdf
>
> It is a long read, and does still start off on the wrong feet (IMHO),
> in particular not understanding the difference between idle and
> working latency.
>
> It is my hope that by widening awareness of more of the real problems
> with latency under load to policymakers and other submitters
> downstream from this new FCC document, and more reading what we had to
> say, that we will begin to make serious progress towards finally
> fixing bufferbloat in the USA.
>
> I do keep hoping that somewhere along the way in the future, the costs
> of IPv4 address exhaustion and the IPv6 transition, will also get
> raised to the national level. [1]
>
> We are still collecting signatures for what the bufferbloat project
> members wrote, and have 1200 bucks in the kitty for further articles
> and/or publicity. Thoughts appreciated as to where we can go next with
> shifting the national debate about bandwidth in a better direction!
> Next up would be trying to get a meeting, and to do an ex-parte
> filing, I think, and I wish we could do a live demonstration on
> television about it as good as feynman did here:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raMmRKGkGD4
>
> Our original posting is here:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/19ADByjakzQXCj9Re_pUvrb5Qe5OK-QmhlYRLMBY4vH4/edit
>
> Larry's wonderful post is here:
> https://circleid.com/posts/20231211-its-the-latency-fcc
>
> [1] How can we get more talking about IPv4 and IPv6, too? Will we have
> to wait another year?
>
> https://hackaday.com/2024/02/14/floss-weekly-episode-769-10-more-internet/
>
> --
> https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/2024_predictions/
> Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
More information about the Rpm
mailing list