[Rpm] [ippm] draft-ietf-ippm-responsiveness

[Lucas Pardue]

Punting on OWD seems fine to me. It's nice but it's more work. This draft is close to done. We can extend RPM directly or indirectly with enhancements in this WG, sounds exciting potential.

I'm partly suggestion OWD punting because we've have had proposals presented in the QUIC WG for how to do that in the transport layer. Measurements methods defined in IPPM could benefit from that. I see a document giving sufficient treatment to the options as some that deserves ample time time to gather consensus.

Cheers
Lucas

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/rpm/attachments/20240119/60510f0e/attachment.html>