[Starlink] Starlink Bufferbloat

[Luis A. Cornejo]

I had an almost identical result via the waveform tool. But was never able
to reproduce it, so I took it as a fluke or waveform mis measurement.

Just judging by the speed it might just be in an isolated cell, not a not
busy time.

It seems that Ookla seems to be gamed by the ISPs frequently. So that might
explain it also.

Have you tried the Cloudflare speed test on your dishy with the same loaded
pings?

-Luis

On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 3:22 PM <tom at evslin.com> wrote:

> I’ve seen isolated results like this from my dish in central Vermont. They
> were more frequent during the beta.
>
>
>
> *From:* Starlink <starlink-bounces at lists.bufferbloat.net> *On Behalf Of *Luis
> A. Cornejo via Starlink
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 31, 2023 4:09 PM
> *To:* Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink at lists.bufferbloat.net>; bloat <
> bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net>
> *Subject:* [Starlink] Starlink Bufferbloat
>
>
>
> I saw this screen shot on Reddit. Seemed like it might of been a fluke?
> Isolated case? Are they cheating? No way they have seen the light?
>
>
>
> I don’t have my dishy anymore, but can someone double check for me?
>
>
>
> https://reddit.com/r/Starlink/s/ysQ0AZ6RKX
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/starlink/attachments/20230831/e2d3b027/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 361700 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/starlink/attachments/20230831/e2d3b027/attachment-0001.png>