[Starlink] insanely great waveform result for starlink

[Jonathan Bennett]

Just ran a Waveform test, and ping times are still terrible while maxing
out download speeds. Upload saturation doesn't seem to affect latency,
though. Also interesting, it's giving me a valid ipv6 block again.

[image: image.png]
[image: image.png]
Jonathan Bennett
Hackaday.com


On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 10:08 PM Dave Taht via Starlink <
starlink at lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:

> has anyone been testing theirs this week?
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Luis A. Cornejo <luis.a.cornejo at gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 7:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Rpm] [Starlink] [LibreQoS] the grinch meets
> cloudflare'schristmas present
> To: MORTON JR., AL <acmorton at att.com>
> Cc: Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com>, Jay Moran <jay at tp.org>, Cake List
> <cake at lists.bufferbloat.net>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm at ietf.org>, Rpm
> <rpm at lists.bufferbloat.net>, bloat <bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net>,
> dickroy at alum.mit.edu <dickroy at alum.mit.edu>, libreqos
> <libreqos at lists.bufferbloat.net>
>
>
> Well Reddit has many posts talking about noticeable performance
> increases for Starlink. Here is a primetime run:
>
> waveform:
>
> https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=333f97c7-7cbd-406c-8d9a-9f850cb5de7d
>
> cloudflare attached
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 11:43 AM MORTON JR., AL <acmorton at att.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dave and Luis,
> >
> > Do you know if any of these tools are using ~random payloads, to defeat
> compression?
> >
> > UDPST has a CLI option:
> > (m)    -X           Randomize datagram payload (else zeroes)
> >
> > When I used this option testing shipboard satellite access, download was
> about 115kbps.
> >
> > Al
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2023 11:12 AM
> > > To: Luis A. Cornejo <luis.a.cornejo at gmail.com>
> > > Cc: Jay Moran <jay at tp.org>; Cake List <cake at lists.bufferbloat.net>;
> IETF IPPM
> > > WG <ippm at ietf.org>; MORTON JR., AL <acmorton at att.com>; Rpm
> > > <rpm at lists.bufferbloat.net>; bloat <bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net>;
> > > dickroy at alum.mit.edu; libreqos <libreqos at lists.bufferbloat.net>
> > > Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Rpm] [Starlink] [LibreQoS] the grinch meets
> > > cloudflare'schristmas present
> > >
> > > Either starlink has vastly improved, or the test is way off in this
> case.
>
>
>
> --
> This song goes out to all the folk that thought Stadia would work:
>
> https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dtaht_the-mushroom-song-activity-6981366665607352320-FXtz
> Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/starlink/attachments/20230112/c4a3e538/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 235280 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/starlink/attachments/20230112/c4a3e538/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 298232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/starlink/attachments/20230112/c4a3e538/attachment-0003.png>