[Starlink] [LibreQoS] It’s the Latency, FCC

[Jim Forster]

I kind of like Waveform BB test, but a couple issues:

* From some places in India? and Southern Africa, the closest server they use is far away.  Consequently the base latency is much higher than most content, which these days comes from CDNs.

* I don’t mind the ads, but I did get a comment from someone I referred to it, that the site was ‘mostly about trying to sell some gear’.  WF could alleviate that with an explanation of who they are, etc.  Maybe it’s there & I missed it?

  — Jim

> On Apr 30, 2024, at 6:02 PM, Dave Taht via LibreQoS <libreqos at lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> 
> he also had a waveform result as best as I recall. Simpler than running flent.
> 
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 2:23 PM Frantisek Borsik <frantisek.borsik at gmail.com <mailto:frantisek.borsik at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Here are the tests Dave was talking about:
>> 
>> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/starlink/attachments/20240501/088079f8/attachment.html>