[Starlink] The "reasons" that bufferbloat isn't a problem

Aidan Van Dyk aidan at highrise.ca
Thu Jun 6 06:37:06 EDT 2024


On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 6:18 AM Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink <
starlink at lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:


> In a sense,  one would be happy to have all the communication standards
> frozen so all is settled and universal interoperability is ensured for
> years.   A little bit like bridges are there for hundreds of years,
> except some, of course.
>

I'm actually glad we aren't forcing our DOTs and cities to still build
bridges as they were 100 years ago, never mind how they were 200 (or 300)
years ago!  There are some old bridges still around, but they are
certainly performing the duty (carrying the load) of our modern bridges!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/starlink/attachments/20240606/e586cb96/attachment.html>


More information about the Starlink mailing list