<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>The PoE "standard" is the same.</p>
<p> Thus, you can power the new terminal with any Starlink PoE
injector (even REV1).</p>
<p></p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 1/25/24 01:40, Jonathan Bennett
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAHtUBujyeSi_zENtk=XvdfqdP-Ty_H5Sxa4t4BPuhZ8LxJFdMA@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">I'm mainly curious if the move back to RJ45 means
they are now using a real POE standard, instead of the custom
solution the previous generations have used.<br clear="all">
<div>
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"
data-smartmail="gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<div>
<div style="color:rgb(34,34,34)">Jonathan Bennett</div>
<div style="color:rgb(34,34,34)">Hackaday.com</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at
4:47 PM Oleg Kutkov via Starlink <<a
href="mailto:starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">I
will try to do better tests this weekend, measuring all the
necessary <br>
parameters. Plus IPv6<br>
<br>
On 1/24/24 14:37, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote:<br>
> Thanks for the tests!<br>
><br>
> The dl/ul speeds 300/15 mbit/s are impressive.<br>
><br>
> At video pointer 5:53 the reported Ping ?/dl/ul
88/204/121 ms and <br>
> Jitter 9.2 ms seem interesting.<br>
><br>
> ==> I am not sure which of the two (ping or
jitter) you name <br>
> 'latency'?<br>
><br>
> ==> I am not sure why the dl (download) ping ms is
higher than the <br>
> ul.<br>
><br>
> ==> I don't know what is the first ('?') parameter
reported as <br>
> 88ms for Ping?<br>
><br>
> I wonder whether the DHCPv6-PD is still supported by REV4
and whether <br>
> the allocated prefix is still a non-/64 (i.e. a /56
delivered by <br>
> DHCPv6-PD reported earlier on this email list by Steven
on Dec. 12, <br>
> 2023)?<br>
><br>
> Alex<br>
><br>
> Le 23/01/2024 à 10:07, Oleg Kutkov via Starlink a écrit :<br>
>> I conducted the initial comparative tests of the new
terminal in <br>
>> Ukraine. I guess it's not a really "legal" because
the new terminal <br>
>> is not certified and not selling outside the US for
the moment. But <br>
>> who cares.<br>
>><br>
>> Here's a video: <a
href="https://youtu.be/hWPMpJrjd1g" rel="noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://youtu.be/hWPMpJrjd1g</a><br>
>><br>
>> I will try to do more technical tests next week.
There will be a new <br>
>> video.<br>
>><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Starlink mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net</a><br>
> <a
href="https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink</a><br>
<br>
-- <br>
Best regards,<br>
Oleg Kutkov<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Starlink mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Best regards,
Oleg Kutkov</pre>
</body>
</html>