<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><title></title><style type="text/css">p.MsoNormal,p.MsoNoSpacing{margin:0}</style></head><body><div>In my original paper/video, I used NY-London as one of the key examples, not because of my funders (the work was actually unfunded - I just did it because I was curious), but because the only two applications I could immediately think of that cared enough about wide-area latency to pay for some premium service were finance and military. I prefered not to write about the military uses, and finance routes like NY-Chicago are already covered by low-latency microwave towers. Also I'm based in London :-)<br></div><div><br></div><div>Mark<br></div><div><br></div><div>On Fri, 2 Feb 2024, at 3:37 PM, Spencer Sevilla via Starlink wrote:<br></div><blockquote type="cite" id="qt" style=""><div dir="auto"><div>Yeah I forget exactly where/when, but approx. five years ago there was a LEO workshop at some big academic networking conference (maybe sigcomm?) and I noticed that almost all the papers used NY-London latency as their primary evaluation metric. One of the papers even proposed some wacky multi hop system using commercial planes that were likely to be reliably scheduled on the route. Confused the hell out of me (reading these papers with an eye towards rural access) until my colleague pointed out the likely funders of the research and their priorities 😂<br></div><div dir="auto"><div><br></div><div class="qt-gmail_quote" dir="auto"><div dir="ltr" class="qt-gmail_attr">On Thu, Feb 1, 2024, 22:07 Dave Taht via Starlink <<a href="mailto:starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net">starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="qt-gmail_quote" style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204, 204, 204);padding-left:1ex;"><div>from here: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39200323" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39200323</a><br></div><div> <br></div><div> There were two things that fell out of reading that article for me.<br></div><div> <br></div><div> "each laser is grossly underused on average, at 0.432% of its maximum capacity."<br></div><div> <br></div><div> +<br></div><div> <br></div><div> "Brashears also said Starlink’s laser system was able to connect two<br></div><div> satellites over 5,400 kilometers (3,355 miles) apart. The link was so<br></div><div> long “it cut down through the atmosphere, all the way down to 30<br></div><div> kilometers above the surface of the Earth,” he said, before the<br></div><div> connection broke."<br></div><div> <br></div><div> So there IS a way to achieve previously unheard of lower latencies (at<br></div><div> a cost in bitrate) across starlink across their network. Two hops to<br></div><div> go 10,000km.<br></div><div> <br></div><div> I loved mark handley's original animation of how the ISL's were<br></div><div> supposed to work, but given the orbits here, I kind of wish it was<br></div><div> easy to plug the assumptions in and figure out what the NY -> tokoyo<br></div><div> run would take in terms of hops and estimated switching overhead,<br></div><div> given this distance record.<br></div><div> <br></div><div> How much data and what kind of data would benefit from that latency<br></div><div> reduction is a matter of speculation. "Buy! Sell!" between tokoyo and<br></div><div> london arbitrage was one of my first speculations many years ago.<br></div><div> <br></div><div> -- <br></div><div> 40 years of net history, a couple songs:<br></div><div> <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9RGX6QFm5E" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9RGX6QFm5E</a><br></div><div> Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos<br></div><div> _______________________________________________<br></div><div> Starlink mailing list<br></div><div> <a href="mailto:Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net</a><br></div><div> <a href="https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink</a><br></div></blockquote></div></div></div><div>_______________________________________________<br></div><div>Starlink mailing list<br></div><div><a href="mailto:Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net">Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net</a><br></div><div><a href="https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink">https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink</a><br></div><div><br></div></blockquote><div><br></div></body></html>