<div dir="ltr">I hope you all realize that quantum entanglement does NOT facilitate FTL communication.<div><br></div><div>v</div><div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 10:46 AM David Fernández via Starlink <<a href="mailto:starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net">starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>"quantum entanglement may be a path to beat the speed of light" <br></div><div><br></div><div>It seems that is not going anywhere. Maybe better warp drives.</div><div><br></div><div>Faster than light comms as a target for 7G mentioned here:</div><div><a href="https://imageio.forbes.com/specials-images/imageserve/653fee7b042dc92df0919930/MnM-Trends-Wheel/960x0.jpg?format=jpg&width=1440" target="_blank">https://imageio.forbes.com/specials-images/imageserve/653fee7b042dc92df0919930/MnM-Trends-Wheel/960x0.jpg?format=jpg&width=1440</a></div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/sarwantsingh/2023/10/30/the-mega-trends-that-will-shape-our-future-world" target="_blank">https://www.forbes.com/sites/sarwantsingh/2023/10/30/the-mega-trends-that-will-shape-our-future-world</a></div><div><br></div><div>So, maybe that means that 6G will be the last G, after all, as faster than light comms seem to be impossible, because paradoxes could be created. </div><div><br></div><div>The end of comms engineering could be in the horizon of our lifetime.<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 07:16:16 -0700 (PDT)</div>
From: David Lang <<a href="mailto:david@lang.hm" target="_blank">david@lang.hm</a>><br>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <<a href="mailto:alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com" target="_blank">alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com</a>><br>
Cc: Gert Doering <<a href="mailto:gert@space.net" target="_blank">gert@space.net</a>>, <a href="mailto:starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net" target="_blank">starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net</a><br>
Subject: Re: [Starlink] The "reasons" that bufferbloat isn't a problem<br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:1r928s39-s5o3-q44n-804n-11ro432210s8@ynat.uz" target="_blank">1r928s39-s5o3-q44n-804n-11ro432210s8@ynat.uz</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"<br>
<br>
Alexandre Petrescu wrote:<br>
<br>
> Le 05/06/2024 à 15:40, Gert Doering a écrit :<br>
>> Hi,<br>
>><br>
>> On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 03:28:45PM +0200, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink <br>
> wrote:<br>
>>> well, ok. One day the satcom latency will be so low that we will not have<br>
>>> enough requirements for its use :-)<br>
>> Your disbelief in physics keeps amazing me :-)<br>
><br>
> sorry :-) Rather than simply 'satcom' I should have said <br>
> satcom-haps-planes-drones. I dont have a name for that.<br>
<br>
you would be better off with plans that don't require beating the speed of <br>
light. Yes, quantum entanglement may be a path to beat the speed of light, but <br>
you still need the electronics to handle it, and have the speed of sound at <br>
temperatures and pressures that humans can live at as a restriction.<br>
<br>
by comparison to your 1ms latency goals, extensive AT&T phone testing decades <br>
ago showed that 100ms was the threshold where people could start to detect a <br>
delay.<br>
<br>
David Lang<br>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Starlink mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net" target="_blank">Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br clear="all"><div><br></div><span class="gmail_signature_prefix">-- </span><br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div>Please send any postal/overnight deliveries to:</div><div><div>Vint Cerf</div><div>Google, LLC</div><div>1900 Reston Metro Plaza, 16th Floor</div><div>Reston, VA 20190</div><div>+1 (571) 213 1346<br></div><div><br style="color:rgb(34,34,34)"></div></div><div><br></div><div>until further notice</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div></div>