* [Rpm] an ookla feature request @ 2022-06-17 16:00 Dave Taht 2022-06-17 16:11 ` Brennen Smith 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Dave Taht @ 2022-06-17 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rpm [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 520 bytes --] It would be helpful if the detailed results showed the provider, OS, and link technology. Even more helpful if y'all would share within your facebook, twitter, linked circles a request to folk to download the new ookla speedtest test and post a screenshot with their detailed results within those circles. This is a test yesterday over verizon 5G on an android, deep in the los gatos hills. -- FQ World Domination pending: https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_codel/ Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC [-- Attachment #2: Screenshot_20220616-171714.jpg --] [-- Type: image/jpeg, Size: 316234 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Rpm] an ookla feature request 2022-06-17 16:00 [Rpm] an ookla feature request Dave Taht @ 2022-06-17 16:11 ` Brennen Smith 2022-06-19 17:04 ` Sebastian Moeller 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Brennen Smith @ 2022-06-17 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Taht; +Cc: Rpm [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2733 bytes --] Ahoy Dave et al., Great questions! 1. We provide the detail on the share page at a high level. We are super careful on the result pages though to make sure that no PII/sensitive data is shared so it is sanitized compared to the detailed result page - here's a Speedtest from Burien, WA as an example: https://www.speedtest.net/result/i/5158723178 - We have the platform - iOS. We don't share the OS version for privacy/security reasons - what if someone shares they are on a vulnerable OS version? - Provider - should be visible, assuming our detection works correctly. While we have some clever overlays, GeoIP is painful. - Link technology - we do capture the link technology on the test result, however if someone has a good contact within Apple on the radio data, I do have a question there. - Loaded latency - we show the IQM value, but not the min max for now. I'll ask our Product team why that decision was made. - The detailed result page has a lot more detail if you scroll, but we recommend against sharing screenshots of that as it can contain sensitive data like precise location and IP addresses. 2. Agreed - we actually do those types of marketing callouts; here's an example: https://www.facebook.com/speedtest/posts/pfbid0J9S2pc3H1ptoSQCT2xJoJBSN9DyvV7jvXUXVYJChrTTmtYczEsRuJKc6sAaWCXyUl With that said, it's all over the place on how people share the data in the thread 😆. Cheers, Brennen Smith VP Technology (206) 739-0807 | brennen@ookla.com linkedin.com/in/brennensmith <https://www.linkedin.com/in/brennensmith/> On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 9:01 AM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: > It would be helpful if the detailed results showed the provider, OS, > and link technology. > > Even more helpful if y'all would share within your facebook, twitter, > linked circles a request to folk to download the new ookla speedtest > test and post a screenshot with their detailed results within those > circles. > > This is a test yesterday over verizon 5G on an android, deep in the > los gatos hills. > > -- > FQ World Domination pending: > https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_codel/ > Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC > -- This email, its contents and attachments contain information from Ziff Davis, Inc. and/or its affiliates which may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be for the addressee(s) only. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and delete the original message and any copies. [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4774 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Rpm] an ookla feature request 2022-06-17 16:11 ` Brennen Smith @ 2022-06-19 17:04 ` Sebastian Moeller 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Sebastian Moeller @ 2022-06-19 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Brennen Smith; +Cc: Dave Täht, Rpm Hi Brennen, > On Jun 17, 2022, at 18:11, Brennen Smith via Rpm <rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote: > > Ahoy Dave et al., > > Great questions! > > 1. We provide the detail on the share page at a high level. We are super careful on the result pages though to make sure that no PII/sensitive data is shared so it is sanitized compared to the detailed result page - here's a Speedtest from Burien, WA as an example: https://www.speedtest.net/result/i/5158723178 > - We have the platform - iOS. We don't share the OS version for privacy/security reasons - what if someone shares they are on a vulnerable OS version? > - Provider - should be visible, assuming our detection works correctly. While we have some clever overlays, GeoIP is painful. > - Link technology - we do capture the link technology on the test result, however if someone has a good contact within Apple on the radio data, I do have a question there. > - Loaded latency - we show the IQM value, but not the min max for now. I'll ask our Product team why that decision was made. > > - The detailed result page has a lot more detail if you scroll, but we recommend against sharing screenshots of that as it can contain sensitive data like precise location and IP addresses. Good thoughts! I guess you are in a decent position to assess which parts are sensitive and offer a "generate sanitized detail page to share", where e.g. you remove enough of IP addresses to make it hard to abuse (heck, just resolve the AS number of the endpoints of the measurement and report that). > > 2. Agreed - we actually do those types of marketing callouts; here's an example: https://www.facebook.com/speedtest/posts/pfbid0J9S2pc3H1ptoSQCT2xJoJBSN9DyvV7jvXUXVYJChrTTmtYczEsRuJKc6sAaWCXyUl > > With that said, it's all over the place on how people share the data in the thread 😆. > > Cheers, > > Brennen Smith > > VP Technology > > (206) 739-0807 | brennen@ookla.com > linkedin.com/in/brennensmith > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 9:01 AM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: > It would be helpful if the detailed results showed the provider, OS, > and link technology. > > Even more helpful if y'all would share within your facebook, twitter, > linked circles a request to folk to download the new ookla speedtest > test and post a screenshot with their detailed results within those > circles. > > This is a test yesterday over verizon 5G on an android, deep in the > los gatos hills. > > -- > FQ World Domination pending: https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_codel/ > Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC > > > This email, its contents and attachments contain information from Ziff Davis, Inc. and/or its affiliates which may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be for the addressee(s) only. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and delete the original message and any copies. > _______________________________________________ > Rpm mailing list > Rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/rpm ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-06-19 17:04 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-06-17 16:00 [Rpm] an ookla feature request Dave Taht 2022-06-17 16:11 ` Brennen Smith 2022-06-19 17:04 ` Sebastian Moeller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox