From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rjmcmahon@rjmcmahon.com>
Received: from bobcat.rjmcmahon.com (bobcat.rjmcmahon.com [45.33.58.123])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D89723B2A4
 for <rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue,  1 Nov 2022 19:39:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.rjmcmahon.com (bobcat.rjmcmahon.com [45.33.58.123])
 by bobcat.rjmcmahon.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D4E991B277;
 Tue,  1 Nov 2022 16:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bobcat.rjmcmahon.com D4E991B277
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rjmcmahon.com;
 s=bobcat; t=1667345988;
 bh=0viZFeKDw06zI/ntzyfAAv8p/scgqesCMgDH2f2nshE=;
 h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=eVGkRYYfbT9A+qsK2k67Jsa7ydy3k0hh2R5CdozA5ARRKK8uG2RB33j8B7mQjsgoN
 7fad4hOnYsGwqW+uB4R8MatQqSOm0e+MJaok9MbKBeXi3QdAFlZvNhslW5yM0mf3Zc
 ney4X0WsEH2oPmmJuGVSRfQqSk2upPmp8/cf6Nuk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2022 16:39:48 -0700
From: rjmcmahon <rjmcmahon@rjmcmahon.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: "MORTON JR., AL" <acmorton@att.com>, Rpm <rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
 ippm@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6kuHJp_PnUBb6J4HiFmy=xTG9uiu7bML7fuHFzNhMr2w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CH0PR02MB79808E2508E6AED66DC7657AD32E9@CH0PR02MB7980.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
 <CH0PR02MB7980DFB52D45F2458782430FD3379@CH0PR02MB7980.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
 <CH0PR02MB7980D3036BF700A074D902A1D3379@CH0PR02MB7980.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAA93jw7Jb_77dZzr-AFjXPtwf_hBxhODyF5UzTX5a-A6+xMkWw@mail.gmail.com>
 <0a8cc31c7077918bf84fddf9db50db02@rjmcmahon.com>
 <CH0PR02MB798043B62D22E8C82F61138DD3379@CH0PR02MB7980.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAA93jw6kuHJp_PnUBb6J4HiFmy=xTG9uiu7bML7fuHFzNhMr2w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <344f2a33b6bcae4ad4390dcb96f92589@rjmcmahon.com>
X-Sender: rjmcmahon@rjmcmahon.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Rpm] lightweight active sensing of bandwidth and buffering
X-BeenThere: rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: revolutions per minute - a new metric for measuring responsiveness
 <rpm.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/rpm>,
 <mailto:rpm-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/rpm>
List-Post: <mailto:rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:rpm-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/rpm>,
 <mailto:rpm-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2022 23:39:50 -0000

Bufferbloat shifts the minimum of the latency or OWD CDF. A suggestion 
is to disable x-axis auto-scaling and start from zero.

Bob
> For about 2 years now the cake w-adaptive bandwidth project has been
> exploring techniques to lightweightedly sense  bandwidth and buffering
> problems. One of my favorites was their discovery that ICMP type 13
> got them working OWD from millions of ipv4 devices!
> 
> They've also explored leveraging ntp and multiple other methods, and
> have scripts available that do a good job of compensating for 5g and
> starlink's misbehaviors.
> 
> They've also pioneered a whole bunch of new graphing techniques, which
> I do wish were used more than single number summaries especially in
> analyzing the behaviors of new metrics like rpm, samknows, ookla, and
> RFC9097 - to see what is being missed.
> 
> There are thousands of posts about this research topic, a new post on
> OWD just went by here.
> 
> https://forum.openwrt.org/t/cake-w-adaptive-bandwidth/135379/793
> 
> and of course, I love flent's enormous graphing toolset for simulating
> and analyzing complex network behaviors.