The status of ISL has improved considerably over the last two months. It is now totally feasible to use in-plane (shown in my simulation, blue lines) and cross-plane (not yet shown, but in use by the constellation) to deliver traffic from Kyiv to Seattle: Best, Mike On Aug 2, 2022, 17:17 +0200, Brennen Smith via Starlink , wrote: > Compared to GEO Sat links, this is very reasonable latency and distance. > > Either GeoIP is wrong, or they’re starting to balance within the mesh for capacity. If you look very closely at the maritime announcement - they’re right on schedule for the latter. > > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 07:41 Dave Taht wrote: > > > It is my guess over a path this (inaccurately selected? lasered?) > > > long, the new speedtest doesn't saturate the link. > > > > > > https://twitter.com/olegkutkov/status/1554404854763819008 > > > > > > -- > > > FQ World Domination pending: https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_codel/ > > > Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC > -- > Brennen Smith VP Technology > (206) 739-0807 | brennen@ookla.com > linkedin.com/in/brennensmith > > > This email, its contents and attachments contain information from Ziff Davis, Inc. and/or its affiliates which may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be for the addressee(s) only. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and delete the original message and any copies. > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink