From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf1-x12a.google.com (mail-lf1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D403B3B29D for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 05:01:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id m3so71006591lfu.2 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 02:01:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=TKi3KVLkDvk8enkHsXJ+S+6pr1q5jeaMKBOMlkvmXpU=; b=IAPKxDdnJOOUADhWW4fkwOfoJnNYPLBMmV2ZL9tT+BFoqhh8VYrz2P/M9wZoRVrbzs SLGMPzeDPO6LjASO7hhWgybnPtw0ydbDltqKmXGcJSeuUzQTsYHB5Qcl7y+vWWkBUWgw kmSFZTnUZNa2DaOO6OuyWxo73KzrwDWx9XQb+QL/mzRHmDdGWwJfAWUlT4z9b5lW63Ag J2NwusGgNYX4axgzUfyGaO23RNiU3TBk9G0XEDcd4qGFIgQReKFf99vthApgmA7IMcfK rE2hLMCRvzrUYb5pSJNlk0MKFMWWMcvfvH2C5iz+x5m2YxpHfcULZgFlNVzfkXtRGHJ4 iXMQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=TKi3KVLkDvk8enkHsXJ+S+6pr1q5jeaMKBOMlkvmXpU=; b=VJx+Hzra6b7DiXQtUOle6GCqsyTW1zbA6pOmSVVFL6LhvA5u+6UE+MPm6GwU0GOyKb cQqI87PwoUiik/sr5Hm3c05lXhi+0OWN0TVQW6WgrkZ3pyOE7pfnUsOcyv0sv7REvDs/ VviE2LMh5ZxJbOEpV2rcjRl+UCF0zj6cA+Gmcw1zxJvtQx7feyFZ9uueo8mw4zIMEyru 2mhHr+cu8WrzCVpB4lsCD1+x9J5Ec6bO730vu6jhLJ+fJv+XAnmQGxeWQSz0zCH1AKs3 Jy0YpCSjKloDTbYDnET6PlFt85uqJccg3kCaE2u2EFkaapUHPjqtfaGaVBorKFj+U0Ep jLnw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532wEbGf7KFvJo/EQwID2QPwN0eoGNhifIGv+IlV6RuObXO/mH5w OtPNMCdLjfNKQWxMyxlvV4o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwWGV5Jj30gxHHrm6gkOYXd0uE3uvNngNACuZZlIwe329kj0vQiIY8PfbnsEIk9fmxEtKTWQw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:283:: with SMTP id j3mr26090759lfp.608.1633942887848; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 02:01:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple (176-93-88-52.bb.dnainternet.fi. [176.93.88.52]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f13sm673963lfq.217.2021.10.11.02.01.26 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Oct 2021 02:01:27 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\)) From: Jonathan Morton In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 12:01:26 +0300 Cc: Christoph Paasch , Rpm Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <444988D6-11E3-41FB-BDF2-E94C1123C216@gmail.com> References: <45E18E9B-DD71-4F8A-92C2-AB5AA4439DC0@gmx.de> To: Sebastian Moeller X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22) Subject: Re: [Rpm] Alternate definitions of "working condition" - unnecessary? X-BeenThere: rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: revolutions per minute - a new metric for measuring responsiveness List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:01:30 -0000 > On 11 Oct, 2021, at 10:31 am, Sebastian Moeller = wrote: >=20 >>> (I am also wondering how reducing the default number of >>> sub-queues from 1024 to 128 behaves on the background of the >>> birthday paradox). >>=20 >> Not sure where the 128 comes from ? >=20 > See above: > [ sched: FQ_CODEL qlength: 0/128 ] > but I might simply be misinterpreting the number here=E2=80=A6 Yes, I think so. This probably refers to the maximum number of packets = that can be enqueued in total, and has no relation to the number of hash = buckets that may or may not be present - though obviously you can't have = more occupied queues than there are enqueued packets. - Jonathan Morton=