I’m not the expert in the room, however I find the report lacking in
one very important area. All these results on latencies, speed, etc., are
categorized based on users “first mile access” technology, leqding the reader
to believe the sole source of these numbrs is the “first mile” which of course
it is not. They do not address the as important issues of the rest of what’s
between “end-2-end”. Take a look at the gaming latency results, and you see
games hosted in
While not trivial by any means, what could/should be done to make these
data more useful for consumers is to figure out the effect of everything past
the “first mile/first hop” and break it out separately. That way, a
(moderately intelligent) user could make a reasonably informed cost-benefit
analysis on which combination of first mile technology and back-end service provider
to choose, assuming there were service providers that offered a choice of “first-mile’
access, or backhaul providers that served a variety of “first mile” providers. Guess
we’re a few years away from that J
RR
-----Original Message-----
From: Starlink [mailto:starlink-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net] On Behalf Of Dave
Taht via Starlink
Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2023 6:08 AM
To: libreqos; Rpm; Dave Taht via Starlink
Cc: Sam Crawford
Subject: [Starlink] NZ latest latency report
I do wish that it broke it out by provider, and recommended somehow to
those suffering still, install a better device... VDSL can be made
vastly more tolerable. Otherwise pretty good, and brings in
starlink...
https://comcom.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/320326/MBNZ-Autumn-Report-28-June-2023.pdf
To pick on samknows a little bit, I think the test does not run long
enough, and should be pulling from higher than what appears to be the
75th percentile.
--
Podcast:
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7058793910227111937/
Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink