From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: dave seddon <dave.seddon.ca@gmail.com>,
Frantisek Borsik <frantisek.borsik@gmail.com>
Cc: Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
codel@lists.bufferbloat.net, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
Jeremy Austin via Rpm <rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
Make-Wifi-fast <make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
ryan@rkhtech.org
Subject: [Rpm] Re: [Bloat] Re: [Cake] CAKE-MQ merged to OpenWrt 25.12 today (February 15)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 14:23:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ecmjpkpj.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANypexSO1MfHT2Qpf9YcNBtnV6OuZD9F8Db_EEkFKga=S176CA@mail.gmail.com>
dave seddon <dave.seddon.ca@gmail.com> writes:
> === Pre-flight Complete ===
> Running 6 test points
>
> [1/6] qdisc=fq_codel flows=1 tool=iperf2
> Switching qdisc to fq_codel...
> Throughput: 9.41 Gbps
> [2/6] qdisc=fq_codel flows=10 tool=iperf2
> Throughput: 9.43 Gbps
> [3/6] qdisc=cake flows=1 tool=iperf2
> Switching qdisc to cake...
> Throughput: 6.93 Gbps
> [4/6] qdisc=cake flows=10 tool=iperf2
> Throughput: 4.37 Gbps <---- cake
> [5/6] qdisc=mq-cake flows=1 tool=iperf2
> Switching qdisc to mq-cake...
> Throughput: 7.17 Gbps
> [6/6] qdisc=mq-cake flows=10 tool=iperf2
> Throughput: 9.44 Gbps <-----
> mq-cake ... Actually, that's interesting. higher than fq_codel
Are you running fq_codel as the root qdisc? Because in that case you're
running through the single qdisc lock, which could explain the
difference. Try running separate fq_codel instances beneath an 'mq'
qdisc as the root.
Also, if you're not setting a shaping rate, cake_mq is basically the
same as just installing an mq qdisc at the root and having separate cake
instances beneath that. So to test the multi-core shaper algorithm
you'll need to set a rate ('bandwidth' parameter).
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-17 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-15 17:42 [Rpm] CAKE-MQ merged to OpenWrt 25.12 today (February 15) Frantisek Borsik
2026-02-17 6:10 ` [Rpm] Re: [Cake] " dave seddon
2026-02-17 6:41 ` [Rpm] Re: [Bloat] " Stephen Hemminger
2026-02-17 13:23 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2026-02-17 14:34 ` [Rpm] Re: [Cake] Re: [Bloat] " Stephen Hemminger
2026-02-17 16:32 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/rpm.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ecmjpkpj.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.seddon.ca@gmail.com \
--cc=frantisek.borsik@gmail.com \
--cc=make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=ryan@rkhtech.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox