From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [45.145.95.4])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91C633CB43;
 Wed, 20 Oct 2021 05:45:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023;
 t=1634723101; bh=Q7x9mkK4zcFuYN3u98lXn5DHk4S0YpaSuUna35q5deU=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From;
 b=R562PbP2C/dRrBDrqmjZcCof/a2ulg2ao8VzYhYPygfkLoyjxSi2c7lOSq5hy6wC3
 kkJuIVkhkXFPRLmmwMHkOQuQWEvQVhKQoK2S81Wmw5UWQqr8bFl8e0NnxKeELtcL1Q
 BWvR63kPOsFExXOPCiq3/AZocox7RHMP7tyMsHJXuJL9dAnoGeo552ESPWvaveqwOk
 UvJwYRvM/m++/SSRxW+jMhRo6P0COMxT1K7/QLqXH0o4qDQC3nybTr+a+FHZhP5CVL
 YwmuVeAb6zZ33+NzzCbSntSmRiMe1EbvfIf6krkGOqUSGgOUwLBpCJ/a5u84z+Es4A
 pdEJ0pGKNeobA==
To: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: Rpm <rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net>, Make-Wifi-fast
 <make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>, Keith Winstein
 <keithw@cs.stanford.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4BD0AC02-62FB-4AE4-B83B-BAF5CCEA2B24@ifi.uio.no>
References: <CAA93jw6Ktn3r413QYt3rA+B5aYFy=Ph359LtOoPEo+9buCtdbw@mail.gmail.com>
 <4BD0AC02-62FB-4AE4-B83B-BAF5CCEA2B24@ifi.uio.no>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:44:58 +0200
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <87lf2of2sl.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: [Rpm] [Make-wifi-fast] tack - reducing acks on wlans
X-BeenThere: rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: revolutions per minute - a new metric for measuring responsiveness
 <rpm.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/rpm>,
 <mailto:rpm-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/rpm>
List-Post: <mailto:rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:rpm-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/rpm>,
 <mailto:rpm-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 09:45:11 -0000

Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> writes:

> Am I being naive? Why can't such an ARQ proxy be deployed? Is it just
> because standardizing this negotiation is too difficult, or would it
> also be too computationally heavy for an AP perhaps, at high speeds?

Immediate thought: this won't work for QUIC or other encrypted
transports (like VPNs).

-Toke