revolutions per minute - a new metric for measuring responsiveness
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rich Brown <richb.hanover@gmail.com>
To: "Dave Täht" <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: Rpm <rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Rpm] NTIA filing
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2022 07:58:52 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <B6EFBDCC-BE1B-4C6E-8156-C26452801D8F@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6FmpiOscJZWqYyr1CkEv+D5m+M9vuUjUzYvH73RO9svg@mail.gmail.com>

Dave,

I didn't have a chance to review this before yesterday's deadline, but you wrote a good note. You hit all the high points, especially in your recommendations.

And the fact that only 133 responses came in means that it *is* likely to be read... Thanks.

Rich

> On Feb 4, 2022, at 3:56 PM, Dave Taht via Rpm <rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> 
> against: https://www.wiley.law/alert-NTIA-Issues-Request-for-Comment-on-Broadband-Programs-Authorized-by-the-Infrastructure-Investment-and-Jobs-Act-Worth-Over-46-Billion
> 
> I leveraged a rpm test in the appendix...
> 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FjRo9MNnVOLh733SNPNyqaR1IFee7Q5qbMrmW1PlPr8/edit#heading=h.tlg9hjfsdlnr
> 
> And I copped stuart cheshires wonderful line that a "busy network
> doesn't have to be a bad network", without attribution. Next time.
> 
> What encourages me about having filed this is there were only 133
> comments so perhaps, perhaps, this will be read.
> 
> I have to admit I've almost had enough with politics this year. I am
> setting aside time, on a beach, with fizzy boat drinks, to
> write some code, or fiction, or maybe, just play guitar.
> 
> -- 
> I tried to build a better future, a few times:
> https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icei.org
> 
> Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
> _______________________________________________
> Rpm mailing list
> Rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/rpm


      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-05 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-04 20:56 Dave Taht
2022-02-04 21:33 ` Jonathan Foulkes
2022-02-05 12:58 ` Rich Brown [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/rpm.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=B6EFBDCC-BE1B-4C6E-8156-C26452801D8F@gmail.com \
    --to=richb.hanover@gmail.com \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox