On 17 July 2022 at 8:17:04 AM, Jeremy Austin via Rpm (rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net) wrote:

We will keep preaching it. 

This also feeds into the frustration around the manipulation of the US (FCC) federal definition of broadband. I care little about a 1000/500 connection with 2000 ms of latency under load; I’d much rather have a 100/20 that never exceeds 100 ms!

<sigh>

Jeremy

On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 8:23 PM Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:

there's three "lovely" new speedtest results here, showing nearly 5sec
of uplink latency under load.

If only more folk would realize it's not the bandwidth, but the working latency.

https://www.pcmag.com/news/starlinks-massive-growth-results-in-congestion-slow-speeds-for-some-users

--
FQ World Domination pending: https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_codel/
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink

--

Jeremy Austin Sr. Product Manager Preseem | Aterlo Networks Book a call: https://app.hubspot.com/meetings/jeremy548 1-833-773-7336 ext 718 | 1-907-803-5422 jeremy@aterlo.com www.preseem.com

_______________________________________________
Rpm mailing list
Rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/rpm