From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 046C03B29D for ; Tue, 24 May 2022 03:31:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id r3so12982888ljd.7 for ; Tue, 24 May 2022 00:31:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3fLECkUlEOZ69VPDgsJl+ptZbzrNj2APu5Rb1T0ko8s=; b=asQyfBLVYNdFM6hPN+/oUHbzueTkQQ4FSZzK8TmilsMX2sRaPDsNuRMthzp10vRxK2 NiIXWe282H1R7CVRhu/PpzLcxz0dpwchqkY9FVVvBDZgdw4aIndTDFhKeq6mrgvl3JDK PakWnNe8vJV31onbDvUk5yS3viwjTaRXYmSCTDpr/sXAr1NBPxkoLumx1uaDSYkCPdbj pS7ujXotDnFFuVUf+BNfkQbaB791s+d6mf0mWIYh27ut4Njyb62SEUPpmE/KMpomUt78 El76BhkzG84tLqA86pHYxUio43c2c3Cs5T3SCdZZzG2cz43B65Kya2fY/a0t3Fh92Tpz I/OQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3fLECkUlEOZ69VPDgsJl+ptZbzrNj2APu5Rb1T0ko8s=; b=bSFus3XCMvn5KnbKbVRR9B9/1GvBqxvLTpJEsbENKaHRFNA+fP1cWjEu5z5nsA8w3x 2W9hDFGxhnzHiD5+TNteoF2QyRtXI1mx1M8yuQdDfh6gX2TnpWyIQCyfw2MUM86K0qeD Cc9vAOM452+qEkapKR+9HDubaBMCipURrkQhmyJL5dzr9YirN8knqvmORxPkkAi1+5Pc 3Xc6D+V83zV8S/gxTgspMDqP9NHzzFuSzNma4nfQu1OGQnpKvsC3VsobvD9QEAycwKoF W2Mxg//KY2wHa5cOE0CK/kUL15jZm0B7M5UiID6tQgA1QhgN+QmqH7ADyEL55ornOO/Q bVcA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533PYCUgXEb74aqduFhSCYWlTjMXxkUksOWMVzPDcaNJhRFOAI2B sUlnhSTowEy0IJcblaA2nRkGQKg7586EmUorYzI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxiURCbKTu/PsiMuXWQVFmUraqU5B93CLkKyolEG8dDopHIUbhZ5Fb/kGvSWy78zlvI+AWisupjEAai78mYo+k= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a602:0:b0:253:d7e2:4d8a with SMTP id v2-20020a2ea602000000b00253d7e24d8amr13128424ljp.284.1653377517509; Tue, 24 May 2022 00:31:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Frantisek Borsik Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 09:31:21 +0200 Message-ID: To: Sebastian Moeller Cc: rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009c625505dfbcf317" Subject: Re: [Rpm] My home connection - Prague, Czech Republic X-BeenThere: rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: revolutions per minute - a new metric for measuring responsiveness List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 07:31:59 -0000 --0000000000009c625505dfbcf317 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hey, not sure how I can do this kind of testing :-) but if You tell me, I will do it, happily. *F.* *https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik * +421919416714 Skype: casioa5302ca On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 9:09 AM Sebastian Moeller wrote: > Hi Frantisek, > > > > On May 24, 2022, at 06:41, Frantisek Borsik via Rpm < > rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote: > > > > Good, good - most of the time. > > > > https://www.speedtest.net/my-result/i/5127045302 > > This test is against fdcservers.net which appear to be > single-homed in Cogent's network, do you see the same high upload latency > under working conditions when measuring against servers in other networks > (that are not connected via Cogent)? > > Regards > Sebastian > > P.S.: Not intended as dig against Cogent it is just that some ISP networks > are known to have issues with connectivity with Cogent, so testing with > servers in other networks can be a useful check. > > > > > > Sent on the move. > > > > F. > > > > https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik > > > > +421919416714 > > Skype: casioa5302ca > > _______________________________________________ > > Rpm mailing list > > Rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/rpm > > --0000000000009c625505dfbcf317 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hey, not sure how I can do this kind of testing :-) b= ut if You tell me, I will do it, happily.


On Tue, May 24, 202= 2 at 9:09 AM Sebastian Moeller <moell= er0@gmx.de> wrote:
Hi Frantisek,


> On May 24, 2022, at 06:41, Frantisek Borsik via Rpm <rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net<= /a>> wrote:
>
> Good, good - most of the time.
>
> https://www.speedtest.net/my-result/i/512704530= 2

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 This test is against fdcservers.net which appea= r to be single-homed in Cogent's network, do you see the same high uplo= ad latency under working conditions when measuring against servers in other= networks (that are not connected via Cogent)?

Regards
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Sebastian

P.S.: Not intended as dig against Cogent it is just that some ISP networks = are known to have issues with connectivity with Cogent, so testing with ser= vers in other networks can be a useful check.


>
> Sent on the move.
>
> F.
>
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik
>
> +421919416714
> Skype: casioa5302ca
> _______________________________________________
> Rpm mailing list
> Rpm@lis= ts.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/rpm

--0000000000009c625505dfbcf317--