Here is my VZ HSI (LTE)

https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=eaa13c1c-8cd1-48b2-8527-7a0d35772aba



On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 9:28 PM Luis A. Cornejo <luis.a.cornejo@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Well Reddit has many posts talking about noticeable performance increases
> for Starlink. Here is a primetime run:
>
> waveform:
>
> https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=333f97c7-7cbd-406c-8d9a-9f850cb5de7d
>
> cloudflare attached
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 11:43 AM MORTON JR., AL <acmorton@att.com> wrote:
>
>> Dave and Luis,
>>
>> Do you know if any of these tools are using ~random payloads, to defeat
>> compression?
>>
>> UDPST has a CLI option:
>> (m)    -X           Randomize datagram payload (else zeroes)
>>
>> When I used this option testing shipboard satellite access, download was
>> about 115kbps.
>>
>> Al
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
>> > Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2023 11:12 AM
>> > To: Luis A. Cornejo <luis.a.cornejo@gmail.com>
>> > Cc: Jay Moran <jay@tp.org>; Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
>> IETF IPPM
>> > WG <ippm@ietf.org>; MORTON JR., AL <acmorton@att.com>; Rpm
>> > <rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net>; bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
>> > dickroy@alum.mit.edu; libreqos <libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net>
>> > Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Rpm] [Starlink] [LibreQoS] the grinch meets
>> > cloudflare'schristmas present
>> >
>> > Either starlink has vastly improved, or the test is way off in this
>> case.
>>
>