Well Reddit has many posts talking about noticeable performance increases for Starlink. Here is a primetime run:waveform:cloudflare attachedOn Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 11:43 AM MORTON JR., AL <acmorton@att.com> wrote:Dave and Luis,
Do you know if any of these tools are using ~random payloads, to defeat compression?
UDPST has a CLI option:
(m) -X Randomize datagram payload (else zeroes)
When I used this option testing shipboard satellite access, download was about 115kbps.
Al
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2023 11:12 AM
> To: Luis A. Cornejo <luis.a.cornejo@gmail.com>
> Cc: Jay Moran <jay@tp.org>; Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; IETF IPPM
> WG <ippm@ietf.org>; MORTON JR., AL <acmorton@att.com>; Rpm
> <rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net>; bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
> dickroy@alum.mit.edu; libreqos <libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Rpm] [Starlink] [LibreQoS] the grinch meets
> cloudflare'schristmas present
>
> Either starlink has vastly improved, or the test is way off in this case.