From: Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@apple.com>
To: rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net
Cc: Omer Shapira <omer_shapira@apple.com>,
Randall Meyer <rrm@apple.com>,
Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>
Subject: [Rpm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-cpaasch-ippm-responsiveness-00.txt
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 10:15:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YRaozyjqw7Bz907F@MacBook-Pro-2.local> (raw)
Hello RPM-list,
please see below our IETF-draft submission that specifies the methodology
used to measure "Responsiveness under working conditions" the way it is
currently implemented in the upcoming iOS and macOS releases.
We believe that this document could be a good starting point to create a
formal specification for a methodology to quantify bufferbloat from the
end-user's perspective (meaning, the way end-users most commonly experience
it).
Feedback is very welcome!
Thanks,
Christoph & co-authors
----- Forwarded message from internet-drafts@ietf.org -----
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@apple.com>, Omer Shapira <oesh@apple.com>, Randall Meyer <rrm@apple.com>, Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 09:43:40 -0700
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-cpaasch-ippm-responsiveness-00.txt
A new version of I-D, draft-cpaasch-ippm-responsiveness-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Christoph Paasch and posted to the
IETF repository.
Name: draft-cpaasch-ippm-responsiveness
Revision: 00
Title: Responsiveness under Working Conditions
Document date: 2021-08-13
Group: Individual Submission
Pages: 12
URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-cpaasch-ippm-responsiveness-00.txt
Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cpaasch-ippm-responsiveness/
Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-cpaasch-ippm-responsiveness
Abstract:
Bufferbloat has been a long-standing problem on the Internet with
more than a decade of work on standardizing technical solutions,
implementations and testing. However, to this date, bufferbloat is
still a very common problem for the end-users. Everyone "knows" that
it is "normal" for a video conference to have problems when somebody
else on the same home-network is watching a 4K movie.
The reason for this problem is not the lack of technical solutions,
but rather a lack of awareness of the problem-space, and a lack of
tooling to accurately measure the problem. We believe that exposing
the problem of bufferbloat to the end-user by measuring the end-
users' experience at a high level will help to create the necessary
awareness.
This document is a first attempt at specifying a measurement
methodology to evaluate bufferbloat the way common users are
experiencing it today, using today's most frequently used protocols
and mechanisms to accurately measure the user-experience. We also
provide a way to express the bufferbloat as a measure of "Round-trips
per minute" (RPM) to have a more intuitive way for the users to
understand the notion of bufferbloat.
The IETF Secretariat
----- End forwarded message -----
next reply other threads:[~2021-08-13 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-13 17:15 Christoph Paasch [this message]
2021-08-13 18:28 ` Christoph Paasch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/rpm.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YRaozyjqw7Bz907F@MacBook-Pro-2.local \
--to=cpaasch@apple.com \
--cc=cheshire@apple.com \
--cc=omer_shapira@apple.com \
--cc=rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=rrm@apple.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox