From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
Cc: "Dave Täht" <dave.taht@gmail.com>,
"Dave Taht via Starlink" <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
Rpm <rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
"Jamal Hadi Salim" <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Rpm] [Starlink] net neutrality back in the news
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 08:36:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZRUe_5uiRJyDxb9Z@Space.Net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C6D4C877-E633-4E4F-B3C2-59E5CDA2A2D4@gmx.de>
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 08:25:31AM +0200, Sebastian Moeller via Starlink wrote:
> ***) Strictly speaking IPv6 is required, since "internet access"
> is defined as reaching all of the internet (as far as in the ISPs
> power) and IPv6-only sites are not reachable for the CG-NAT-only
> customers. But so far the local regulator does not seem to enforce
> that requirement, or hopefully is working on this quietly behind
> the curtains.
I still maintain that a better google ranking for "content with IPv6"
would bring us 90%+ IPv6 availability on the content side in a very
short time (look at the craziness some of these SEOs are willing to
endure, just to get a better ranking)...
(For Germany, I do not see the lone acces ISP without IPv6 as "the most
sore spot", as most of the large ISPs and all of the mobile carriers
include IPv6 nowadays - but content is still lacking)
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-28 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-27 18:21 [Rpm] " Dave Taht
2023-09-28 3:33 ` rjmcmahon
2023-09-28 6:06 ` Dave Taht
2023-10-01 17:08 ` [Rpm] [Starlink] " Sebastian Moeller
2023-10-05 19:22 ` Dave Taht
2023-09-28 6:25 ` [Rpm] " Sebastian Moeller
2023-09-28 6:36 ` Gert Doering [this message]
2023-09-28 7:14 ` [Rpm] [Starlink] " Sebastian Moeller
2023-09-28 7:33 ` Gert Doering
2023-09-28 7:38 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-09-28 16:38 ` [Rpm] " Dave Taht
2023-09-28 16:52 ` [Rpm] [Starlink] " Livingood, Jason
2023-09-28 17:04 ` rjmcmahon
2023-09-28 19:31 ` [Rpm] " Sebastian Moeller
2023-09-28 19:39 ` Dave Taht
2023-09-28 20:08 ` [Rpm] [LibreQoS] " dan
2023-09-28 20:18 ` Dave Taht
2023-09-29 19:00 ` [Rpm] Getting Google to index. was:Re: [Starlink] " Rodney W. Grimes
2023-09-28 20:36 ` [Rpm] " Jeremy Austin
2023-09-28 20:54 ` [Rpm] [Bloat] " Livingood, Jason
2023-09-28 20:48 ` [Rpm] [Starlink] " Livingood, Jason
2023-09-28 22:19 ` [Rpm] [Bloat] " David Lang
2023-09-29 4:54 ` Jonathan Morton
2023-09-29 12:28 ` Rich Brown
2023-09-29 16:15 ` dan
2023-09-30 12:00 ` Frantisek Borsik
2023-09-30 12:19 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-09-30 12:42 ` [Rpm] [Starlink] [Bloat] " Vint Cerf
2023-09-30 14:07 ` Sebastian Moeller
[not found] ` <CAMo6_mstw1tKjZfonQ=3Zc5TNqrffkEiUEXzCxLUf85o3kJs9A@mail.gmail.com>
2023-09-30 15:20 ` [Rpm] [Bloat] [Starlink] " Sebastian Moeller
2023-09-30 15:23 ` [Rpm] [LibreQoS] [Bloat] [Starlink] " Dave Taht
2023-09-30 17:35 ` Dave Taht
2023-09-30 21:57 ` [Rpm] New email list: NNagain for network neutrality Dave Taht
2023-10-04 22:19 ` [Rpm] [Bloat] [Starlink] [LibreQoS] net neutrality back in the news Michael Richardson
2023-09-29 6:24 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-09-29 6:31 ` [Rpm] [Starlink] [Bloat] " Gert Doering
2023-09-29 7:07 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-09-28 22:25 ` [Rpm] " David Lang
2023-09-28 17:10 ` [Rpm] [Bloat] " Livingood, Jason
2023-09-28 19:30 ` Dave Taht
2023-09-28 20:05 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-09-28 21:07 ` [Rpm] [EXTERNAL] " Livingood, Jason
2023-09-28 21:08 ` Livingood, Jason
2023-09-29 8:56 ` [Rpm] [Bloat] [EXTERNAL] " Erik Auerswald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/rpm.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZRUe_5uiRJyDxb9Z@Space.Net \
--to=gert@space.net \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
--cc=rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox