From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.switch.ch (mx1.switch.ch [85.235.88.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A54D3B29E for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 16:22:38 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: by SpamTitan at switch.ch DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=switch.ch; s=selector1; t=1641936156; bh=9vUKR5lDIlm51p17mk7FBJxm8pRi/vyFaCmQShKGg+U=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=GCTqi1MOiyc4nn5xRlM6sS/pCwv+R1sXZETU79xY/92QUZ+B59tx9JCGDa/ip6pF2 u4tnWNAUMrjtcfe0k8ER7ndaXoKcgIq0DaiMlk43Nh5QDegXb1QZICLDn4A3iak9Ol +zhzsCMzrRt5mUI2x6mWxkUg3ERZc5HZkSc/3uvkR2jc8NGOJNEwrm4Ulhons8CUNA V46jpMfgeY5v/X6NY1IgGzuYfi2bUbjvoAyuD+b7o6IahyMcbX/tR7DXOBhZncObKm flogrDfCO0fJez+JaMuBVM9P5Fzwa5ePRAgP0qQn389g5MBx4vksiawEBbA9ZJNxyN xGvPGnE1FlA1g== Authentication-Results: mx1.switch.ch; x-trusted-ip=pass From: Simon Leinen To: Dave Taht via Rpm In-Reply-To: (Dave Taht via Rpm's message of "Sun, 9 Jan 2022 18:57:48 -0800") References: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (darwin) Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 22:22:30 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [172.16.60.33] X-ClientProxiedBy: SWH-S05-EXC3.swd.switch.ch (172.16.60.14) To SWH-S04-EXC2.swd.switch.ch (172.16.60.12) Subject: Re: [Rpm] apm metric - annoyance per minute X-BeenThere: rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: revolutions per minute - a new metric for measuring responsiveness List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 21:22:38 -0000 Dave Taht via Rpm writes: > or gpm - glitch per minute > defined as a latency excursion of more than 20ms. Nice, but shouldn't it be something like "mean time between glitches", according to the mantra that "higher should be better"? -- Simon.