From: Daniel AJ Sokolov <daniel@falco.ca>
To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] FCC Denies Starlink Low-Orbit Bid for Lower Latency (Mark Harris)
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:05:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <007f1215-e15f-4aae-a7de-3958c0914e68@falco.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.2403131951070.20294@nftneq.ynat.uz>
On 3/13/24 19:55, David Lang via Starlink wrote:
> this doesn't make sense to me. The ISS can go as low as 360km before
> they get a boost back to a higher orbit, but the starlink satellites
> they are denying will all be lower than that (and worst case, they can
> force SpaceX to pay for a few additional reboost missions over the next
> 6 years before they deorbit it)
These satellites would be in the way of supply missions to/from ISS.
> but they would avoid the thousands of satellites going up and down
> through the ISS orbit range to get to their ~550km orbit/
They don't linger there, so that's different.
BR
Daniel AJ
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-14 6:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-14 1:59 the keyboard of geoff goodfellow
2024-03-14 2:55 ` David Lang
2024-03-14 6:05 ` Daniel AJ Sokolov [this message]
2024-03-14 17:11 ` David Lang
2024-03-14 3:30 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=007f1215-e15f-4aae-a7de-3958c0914e68@falco.ca \
--to=daniel@falco.ca \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox