On a side note (TX vs RX): When people look at the "speed" of Internet connections, there's often a focus on "down" as opposed to "up". For folk working from home using cloud storage for audio or video content that they edit, not having a lot of "up" is an issue. Here's what to expect around our neck of the woods: https://comcom.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0023/314816/MBNZ-Summer-Report-2-May-2023.pdf (page 7 and 9) Now one of the interesting bits about Starlink is that its uplink performance is really not that great in comparison to downlink here in NZ - pretty much the worst of the current technologies: This agrees with what I've seen here personally. ADSL in non-fibre areas generally now means "miles from the DSLAM", as does VDSL. DSLAM-side crosstalk tends to be the limiting factor there. Non-fibre areas also generally mean "far from the base station". HFC is available in only a few select areas here as NZ does not have large cable networks. On 12/05/2023 10:18 am, Oleg Kutkov via Starlink wrote: > On 5/12/23 01:12, Sirapop Theeranantachai wrote: > > > Just a confirmation, HP terminal can work with two satellites at the > > same time, one for only TX, and the other for only RX. Is this > > statement still correct? > > > Correct. It's a hardware limitation. A switch inside connects antenna > elements to transmitter or receiver chains. > Plus, each Dishy can do TX only in specified time slots. TX slots depend > on the allowed duty cycle and are defined by a global scheduler. > > -- > Best regards, > Oleg Kutkov > > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink > -- **************************************************************** Dr. Ulrich Speidel School of Computer Science Room 303S.594 (City Campus) The University of Auckland u.speidel@auckland.ac.nz http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~ulrich/ ****************************************************************