From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A99353CB39 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 07:43:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 3BFChPOe053399; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 13:43:25 +0100 Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id DE3C3203E51; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 13:43:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F9D203E3C; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 13:43:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.14.2.170] ([10.14.2.170]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 3BFChPbf049943; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 13:43:25 +0100 Message-ID: <02cc2879-ef99-4388-bc1e-335a4aaff6aa@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 13:43:25 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: fr To: Gert Doering Cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <55037f9a-bc2c-4bbb-a4bb-47ad30f16190@rjmcmahon.com> From: Alexandre Petrescu In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CEA-Virus: SOPHOS_SAVI_ERROR_OLD_VIRUS_DATA Subject: Re: [Starlink] [NNagain] FCC Upholds Denial of Starlink's RDOF Application X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 12:43:27 -0000 Le 15/12/2023 à 13:37, Gert Doering a écrit : > Hi, > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 01:07:10PM +0100, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: >> subscriber ; they light only one, equalling 1gbit/s.  It means that they could >> scale it up later to 4 or 5 gbit/s, without additional installation.  At the > You do not need multiple fibers to transfer more than 1gbit/s - the benefit > is "multiple services or multiple providers could use those extra fibers" > (or "have a backup in case one is damanged") > > Fiber7.ch delivers 25 Gbit/s to the home in switzerland, on a single fiber :-) It is worth noting indeed. So, a requirement to a competitive satcom would be like 25 Gbit/s.  I think it is not impossible to make, if many intermediate layers (HAPS, drones etc) are used, and larger band widths. Alex > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster