From: Oleg Kutkov <contact@olegkutkov.me>
To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Starlink] Re: Starlink Standby Mode
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 00:01:00 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <048be086-22b8-4c20-9be8-e4f86e620031@olegkutkov.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKJdXWBvBSyG7P8BF6+7s9SUYtFvbg=dwK=nVe15=iQgFFuJAg@mail.gmail.com>
Well. I prefer a good old free pause.
I have seven Starlink terminals on my account, and I mostly don't use
them, except for some experiments, occasional tests, firmware dumps, and
similar purposes.
Now they will charge me $35 each month for basically nothing.
On 9/9/25 23:14, Luis A. Cornejo via Starlink wrote:
> There is another electric cooperative in my county that did just that.
> Strung fiber along the posts, I was not lucky enough to be part of their
> territory. But from people that I know it’s similar that’s it’s fast but
> not always reliable, so storms can take some down, often around here it’s
> also a backhoe, and when it does down, it’s down for a while.
>
> But I agree, it’s a great backup. Although it probably costs almost as much
> to run in electricity as the service itself! =o)
>
> -Luis
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 1:41 PM Colin_Higbie via Starlink <
> starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
>> I find the Standby mode to be a great backup option. $5/mo for unlimited
>> low-bandwidth usage. This is something I've been urging them to offer for
>> about a year now.
>>
>> About 18 months after I originally purchased and subscribed to Starlink,
>> our power company (not phone company as you'd expect, really our electric
>> power company) rolled out fiber to rural communities in northern NH. As
>> great as Starlink was compared to what we had before, fiber is even better
>> now that it's available (1Gbps for $79/mo, consistently tests as A on
>> Bufferbloat). But it's not 100% reliable. For example, when there are
>> widespread power outages, it goes down. The Starlink standby option is
>> perfect for those situations.
>>
>> Latency remains decent, just limited bandwidth. And if the fiber outage
>> remains in effect for too long, we could always activate Starlink at full
>> bandwidth for that month, where it appears they're taking that option away
>> from people with inactive accounts not already on Standby mode (they may be
>> bluffing on that – you'd think they would want to make it easy for anyone
>> to give them money and resubscribe, standby customer or not).
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Colin
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlink mailing list -- starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> To unsubscribe send an email to starlink-leave@lists.bufferbloat.net
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list -- starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> To unsubscribe send an email to starlink-leave@lists.bufferbloat.net
--
Best regards,
Oleg Kutkov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-09 21:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <175739769285.1561.9299932820839760282@gauss>
2025-09-09 18:41 ` Colin_Higbie
2025-09-09 20:14 ` Luis A. Cornejo
2025-09-09 21:01 ` Oleg Kutkov [this message]
2025-09-09 21:20 ` J Pan
2025-09-10 5:36 ` Ulrich Speidel
2025-09-10 6:00 ` Sebastian Moeller
2025-09-10 7:53 ` David Lang
2025-09-10 10:24 ` Ulrich Speidel
2025-09-10 16:01 ` J Pan
2025-09-08 21:34 [Starlink] " Luis A. Cornejo
2025-09-09 5:35 ` [Starlink] " J Pan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=048be086-22b8-4c20-9be8-e4f86e620031@olegkutkov.me \
--to=contact@olegkutkov.me \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox