From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.nextlayer.at (smtp2.nextlayer.at [81.16.150.37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80AE13B29D for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2023 02:23:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [IPV6:2a00:e68:14:816:172:31:22:143] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:e68:14:816:172:31:22:143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.nextlayer.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56CA280BE66; Fri, 7 Jul 2023 08:23:20 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.nextlayer.at 56CA280BE66 Message-ID: <06c7e204-5eba-4766-3b39-dfaa33f41f69@falco.ca> Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 23:23:10 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Content-Language: en-CA To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <114eabbd-cf5b-1c08-8226-fbf53455d9ea@falco.ca> <6p3296pr-96n3-8p77-ps68-25155r16o365@ynat.uz> <32d09d76-7aa6-a469-9539-d02a9fa9c7f3@gmail.com> From: Daniel AJ Sokolov In-Reply-To: <32d09d76-7aa6-a469-9539-d02a9fa9c7f3@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Starlink] orbital maneuvers 12 per sat in the last 6 months X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2023 06:23:24 -0000 On 7/6/23 22:28, blakangel@gmail.com wrote: > I think the main point of the article is that the amount of maneuvers > needed is currently increasing exponentially: Indeed, I read that. But the article does not explain why they think this trend will continue exponentially. Obviously it can't continue exponentially forever, because eventually all satellites are on the move evading one another 100% of the time. :-) Cheers Daniel