Re: [Starlink] It’s the Latency, FCC

[Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1083 bytes --]


Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
    > We made a point, easily demonstrable, that a 10Mbit link with 1ms
    > latency (to the nearest CDN) will outperforma 10Gbit link with 50ms.

Agreed.

    > I have now been trying to break the common conflation that download
    > "speed" means anything at all for day to day, minute to minute, second
    > to second, use, once you crack 10mbit, now, for over 14 years. Am I
    > succeeding? I lost the 25/10 battle, and keep pointing at really
    > terrible latency under load and wifi weirdnesses for many existing
    > 100/20 services today.

Yes. The problem starts with the geeks, who in my town seem to readily go for
the 100Mb/s FTTH (GPON) link from the incompetent incumbent telco rather than
the 50/10 VDSL from a competent ISP.

-- 
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [ 
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [ 
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [ 
	

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 658 bytes --]