Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel AJ Sokolov <daniel@falco.ca>
To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] orbital maneuvers 12 per sat in the last 6 months
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 18:01:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <114eabbd-cf5b-1c08-8226-fbf53455d9ea@falco.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5a0s+-BxjWLHYjbdmGc1-xXGjTpSdpAy+D6H93RrTbKw@mail.gmail.com>



On 7/6/23 17:54, Dave Taht via Starlink wrote:
> https://www.space.com/starlink-satellite-conjunction-increase-threatens-space-sustainability
> 
> I am under the impression that each sat is capable of about 500 over
> the satellite's lifetime. I am curious as to what they are avoiding.

Assuming your number of 500 is correct, I don't see any worry here. 12 
moves in 6 months makes 492 in 20.5 years. That is less than 500 and 
beyond the lifetime expectation of the satellite anyway.

A I missing something?
Daniel AJ

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-07  1:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-07  0:54 Dave Taht
2023-07-07  1:01 ` Daniel AJ Sokolov [this message]
2023-07-07  4:49   ` David Lang
2023-07-07  5:28     ` blakangel
2023-07-07  6:02       ` David Lang
2023-07-07 22:28         ` Ulrich Speidel
2023-07-08 14:06           ` Dave Taht
2023-07-08 20:49             ` David Lang
2023-07-07  6:23       ` Daniel AJ Sokolov
2023-07-07  6:34         ` Mike Puchol
2023-07-07  7:13           ` Daniel AJ Sokolov
2023-07-07  7:22             ` Mike Puchol
2023-07-07 12:51           ` tom
2023-07-07 13:18             ` Mike Puchol
2023-07-08 13:53               ` Larry Press

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=114eabbd-cf5b-1c08-8226-fbf53455d9ea@falco.ca \
    --to=daniel@falco.ca \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox