From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1F053B2A4 for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:22:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F4038991; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:39:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id VbSqgVa5AYQS; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:39:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA853898F; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:39:10 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1681407550; bh=vvB1FARp6DKTIXcheTt+vYiQMsXt80SZRtFEphhTphc=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=NIX2ZuB9bSPjoCrO0srPvLpDZOFJFbliIQtbQj7puqAVEoBKyzSD22aSNsk0+6gjF 6WOZxkGoBPzY/2rRQqaBbHfpjk8OHR1R5867JYl9+4X7jF5W20pGSy8uoxZMHsUDsH 6XVy+X+wNXVAPQkBqIWt40e8Z/sf0H+E53vFhF/3VdCTRpNol7oMMfh1oKxlm7puks 0mLKieilykSjI32RS+cEpPOyiNHejeKYXeTz+jdqzX8Gl2+rHOS3YLHurnjKp5A9Oj sgGlbcf166ZyVvS2oA6Rht9ifQz0Xh84vghgHMpvCRIK6XpcD04gtkkuVazrAttzDe lULLfxFosyxTA== Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 268C34A1; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:22:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Richardson To: =?us-ascii?Q?=3D=3FUTF-8=3FQ=3FDavid=5FFern=3DC3=3DA1ndez=3F=3D?= , starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 27.1 X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m Subject: Re: [Starlink] fiber IXPs in space X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 17:22:05 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable David Fern=C3=A1ndez via Starlink wrote: > Wondering what benefit would have for any space agency to move its DNS > root server "up there"? Probably very little. > Is GEO an option? The delay up to GEO and back is pretty long. LEO would be better, but doesn't stay in the same place for many. But, how often do you need to query root name servers if you cache well? But, advantages that I can see: 1) power. uninterrupted, disjoint from terrestrial infrastructure. 2) so available all over a hemisphere despite whatever disaster occurs. 3) can answer queries from other space situated systems. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFFBAEBCgAvFiEEbsyLEzg/qUTA43uogItw+93Q3WUFAmQ4OjoRHG1jckBzYW5k ZWxtYW4uY2EACgkQgItw+93Q3WXM6gf9G/w96ekhChZlNKETUVzHqW1C9iAmAQE+ cHDymGHl/Xj2twkkHgCcVCF+LsTCDSGDCvhNLPP4ChmGBRKJ1QEudc9BQoMH3P7Y dt5PLKdKu5/GAQsLtvBal8WE3GtfxNUgm8Xjqpq+jYBm7hGpowWYZwg48BkflvlA BOV+Ko/XnaLc6c9xtEzHsmXh4DtlDIOqvd/1I8jHo1lhdGrqFBRXV8pFo7Xhr2R5 Ntpv+l2NXJBdckVa6PIaYrHFRCVcDjaXbnjuS0uI7ompeQ27p9VqTFmij7qOHAMa br1/9zWQykGPdDuv/ZxKRUh1T+0S4lInyNpMhI0SApoKrXj3BlRzIg== =5dFq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--