Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Darrell Budic <budic@onholyground.com>, starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink tidbits from NANOG
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 14:16:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <172619.1636049781@dooku> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7907F9D1-9511-4254-BD8F-701888EB6778@onholyground.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 835 bytes --]


Thanks for bringing us this view..

Darrell Budic <budic@onholyground.com> wrote:
    > - v6 is deliberately
    > not fully functional, but they know some of use are using it and it
    > will eventually be fully activated. May be waiting on the regional
    > connectivity, so will be intersting to see if changes for some areas
    > and not others as they roll it out.

Even if they used IPv6 for the "last mile" and ran NAT64, that would still be
a major improvement over trying to run dual stack.   That's what the smarter
mobile operators are already doing. (jio, some US carriers...)

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 487 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-04 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-04 15:26 Darrell Budic
2021-11-04 16:21 ` Dave Taht
2021-11-04 16:46 ` Dave Taht
2021-11-04 17:11   ` Dave Taht
2021-11-05  1:30     ` Darrell Budic
2021-11-05  1:41   ` Darrell Budic
2021-11-05  1:46   ` Darrell Budic
2021-11-04 18:16 ` Michael Richardson [this message]
2021-11-04 18:25   ` Inemesit Affia
2021-11-04 18:29   ` Dave Taht
2021-11-04 19:10     ` Michael Richardson
2021-11-05  0:34 ` Ulrich Speidel
2021-11-05  1:05   ` Nathan Owens
2021-11-05  1:18     ` Darrell Budic
2021-11-05 22:24       ` Ulrich Speidel
2021-11-05 15:00     ` [Starlink] data sovereignty Michael Richardson
2021-11-05 15:07       ` Spencer Sevilla
2021-11-05 17:36       ` Daniel AJ Sokolov
2021-11-05 18:01       ` Daniel AJ Sokolov
2021-11-05 22:12     ` [Starlink] Starlink tidbits from NANOG Ulrich Speidel
2021-11-05  1:27   ` Darrell Budic
2021-11-05 15:03     ` Michael Richardson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=172619.1636049781@dooku \
    --to=mcr@sandelman.ca \
    --cc=budic@onholyground.com \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox