From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from puck.nether.net (puck.nether.net [IPv6:2001:418:3f4::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3EA83CB37 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 19:50:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [206.214.230.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by puck.nether.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D2646540058; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 19:50:06 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1BBA05F9-BA00-4D57-ADC8-9E0AEB2B02F3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) From: Jared Mauch In-Reply-To: <6F9998BC34254E79864F5DECBC5A685E@SRA6> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 19:50:05 -0400 Cc: Nathan Owens , starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net Message-Id: <1EF494BA-D346-45FC-B9F1-7F93FE3A037D@puck.nether.net> References: <6F9998BC34254E79864F5DECBC5A685E@SRA6> To: dickroy@alum.mit.edu X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18F72) Subject: Re: [Starlink] dslreports speedtest X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 23:50:19 -0000 --Apple-Mail-1BBA05F9-BA00-4D57-ADC8-9E0AEB2B02F3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I plan to leave a raspi up here and have a way to get in and test it out rem= otely. We have been doing a lot of work on the solar to make sure it can run= things 24x7 including the Maine winters as this is a remote area.=20 Sent from my TI-99/4a > On Jun 28, 2021, at 7:18 PM, Dick Roy wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BF > Yes of course =E2=80=A6 pardon the BFOMP (=E2=80=9Cbrain fart on my part=E2= =80=9D) :^((((( > =20 > From: Nathan Owens [mailto:nathan@nathan.io]=20 > Sent: Monday, June 28, 2021 4:12 PM > To: dickroy@alum.mit.edu > Cc: Jared Mauch; starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > Subject: Re: [Starlink] dslreports speedtest > =20 > That would be interesting to look at =E2=80=94 To clarify, the latency bli= ps are on 15 second intervals. > =20 > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 3:51 PM Dick Roy wrote: > If you have an obstructed view of the sky, it would be interesting to look= > at the test results as a function of time to see if the periodic 15 minuut= e > latency blips you've all seen aren't replaced by a more sporadic/random se= t > of satellite switching times.=20 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Starlink [mailto:starlink-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net] On Behalf O= f > Jared Mauch > Sent: Monday, June 28, 2021 3:39 PM > To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > Subject: Re: [Starlink] dslreports speedtest >=20 > my result if someone wants to look at it: >=20 > http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/68794590 >=20 > I'm about 40-50' away from the router which is outside with the > solar panels and other gear. I'm inside and dishy is on the roof > partially obstructed but somewhat better after some light application of > the chainsaw. >=20 > - jared >=20 >=20 > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 06:35:25PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote: > >=20 > > I went to go check my bufferbloat and it says: > >=20 > > This connection is not satellite > > latency of 45ms is too low > > Test cancelled > >=20 > > Kinda amusing. > >=20 > > - Jared > >=20 > > (e-mail sent over ssh via starlink) > >=20 > > --=20 > > Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net > > clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only > mine. > > _______________________________________________ > > Starlink mailing list > > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink >=20 > --=20 > Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net > clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine= . > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink --Apple-Mail-1BBA05F9-BA00-4D57-ADC8-9E0AEB2B02F3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I plan to leave a raspi up here and have a w= ay to get in and test it out remotely. We have been doing a lot of work on t= he solar to make sure it can run things 24x7 including the Maine winters as t= his is a remote area. 

Sent from my TI-99/4a

On Jun 28, 2021, at 7:18 P= M, Dick Roy <dickroy@alum.mit.edu> wrote:

=EF=BB=BF =

Yes of course =E2=80=A6 pardon the BFOM= P (=E2=80=9Cbrain fart on my part=E2=80=9D) :^(((((

 

From: Nathan= Owens [mailto:nathan@nathan.io]
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2021 4= :12 PM
To: dickroy@alum.mit.edu
Cc: Jared Mauch; starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] dslre= ports speedtest

 

That would be interesting to look at =E2=80=94 To clarify, the laten= cy blips are on 15 second intervals.

 

On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 3:51 PM Dick Roy <dickroy@alum.mit.edu> wrote:

If you have an obstructed view of the sky, it would be interesting t= o look
at the test results as a function of time to see if the periodic 15 minuute<= br> latency blips you've all seen aren't replaced by a more sporadic/random set<= br> of satellite switching times.

-----Original Message-----
From: Starlink [mailto:starlink-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net] On Behalf= Of
Jared Mauch
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2021 3:39 PM
To: star= link@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] dslreports speedtest

        my result if someone wants to look at it:

h= ttp://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/68794590

        I'm about 40-50' away from the router which is outside with the
solar panels and other gear.  I'm inside and dishy is on the roof
partially obstructed but somewhat better after some light application of
= the chainsaw.

        - jared


On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 06:35:25PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> I went to go check my bufferbloat and it says:
>
> This connection is not satellite
> latency of 45ms is too low
> Test cancelled
>
> Kinda amusing.
>
>       - Jared
>
> (e-mail sent over ssh via starlink)
>
> --
> Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net
> clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements a= re only
mine.
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Sta= rlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink

--
Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net
clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are on= ly mine.
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlink= @lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink

_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlink= @lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink

= --Apple-Mail-1BBA05F9-BA00-4D57-ADC8-9E0AEB2B02F3--