From: Eugene Y Chang <eugene.chang@ieee.org>
To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <starlink@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
Cc: Eugene Chang <eugene.chang@ieee.org>,
Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>,
Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Starlink] some post Starship launch thoughts
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 11:05:00 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1F70FD46-3CC0-47D5-9691-CE3FBA58F34A@ieee.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202304262041.33QKfOVh096953@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1786 bytes --]
Rodney,
I agree with your point of view.
To neutralize the exhaust of the rocket engine, it is all about taking the energy out of the exhaust. Taking out the energy will slow the speed of the exhaust gas and take down the temperature.
To get into more nitty gritty, the amount of heat absorbed by H2O or LN2, depends on the dT (the temperature change) and also any heat of phase transition (e.g. liquid to gas).
Gene
----------------------------------------------
Eugene Chang
eugene.chang@ieee.org
o 781-799-0233
> On Apr 26, 2023, at 10:41 AM, Rodney W. Grimes via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
>> As always I enjoy the flood of information we get on this list!
>>
>> still, so far, my research on a nitrogen deluge system (instead of
>> water) has come up empty for me, except as a fire suppressant. So it?s
>> either crazy or brilliant. Or both! I really liked the idea of
>> something cooler that was a natural byproduct of the LOX process...
>
> I dont think cooler does much, isnt it the "energy of vaporization"
> that is actually doing all the "work" in this type of system?
>
> H2O is 40.7 kJ/mol and LN2 is 5.6 kJ/mol so you would
> need ~7 times as much LN2 to do the same work.
>
> And the reason N2 is used as a fire suppressant is again not
> because of temperature, but because it displaces the O2 and
> suffocates the fire. N2 is also easier on our ozone layer
> than the prior used Halon. Finally, this is usually
> compressed N2 gas, not LN2.
>
> --
> Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 9035 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-26 21:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-24 14:12 Dave Taht
2023-04-24 15:16 ` Michael Richardson
2023-04-24 15:27 ` Dave Taht
2023-04-24 15:37 ` Michael Richardson
2023-04-24 15:49 ` Nathan Owens
2023-04-24 19:03 ` David Lang
2023-04-24 19:16 ` David Lang
2023-04-25 0:46 ` Eugene Chang
2023-04-25 2:20 ` David Lang
2023-04-25 22:31 ` Bruce Perens
2023-04-25 23:04 ` Eugene Chang
2023-04-25 23:22 ` David Lang
2023-04-25 23:55 ` Eugene Y Chang
2023-04-26 19:14 ` Michael Richardson
2023-04-25 1:01 ` Bruce Perens
2023-04-26 19:29 ` Dave Taht
2023-04-26 20:05 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-04-26 20:41 ` Rodney W. Grimes
2023-04-26 21:05 ` Eugene Y Chang [this message]
2023-04-26 22:15 ` Mark Handley
2023-04-26 22:29 ` [Starlink] Fondag Bruce Perens
2023-04-26 22:32 ` Rodney W. Grimes
2023-04-26 22:35 ` Nathan Owens
2023-04-26 23:09 ` Nathan Owens
2023-04-27 3:42 ` David Lang
2023-04-26 21:10 ` [Starlink] some post Starship launch thoughts Dave Taht
2023-04-26 21:26 ` Eugene Chang
2023-04-26 22:31 ` Rodney W. Grimes
2023-04-26 22:38 ` Bruce Perens
2023-04-26 23:25 ` Eugene Chang
2023-04-27 3:44 ` David Lang
2023-04-27 14:09 ` Rodney W. Grimes
2023-04-24 16:02 David Fernández
[not found] <mailman.798.1682383621.1222.starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2023-04-25 20:40 ` David P. Reed
2023-04-25 21:31 ` Sauli Kiviranta
2023-04-25 22:37 ` David Lang
2023-05-11 16:24 ` Sauli Kiviranta
2023-04-25 22:33 ` David Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1F70FD46-3CC0-47D5-9691-CE3FBA58F34A@ieee.org \
--to=eugene.chang@ieee.org \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=starlink@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox