From: "Dave Täht" <davet@teklibre.net>
To: Mike Puchol <mike@starlink.sx>
Cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Starlink] not that I consider the dailymail credible but
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 21:29:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220321212932.GA5849@mail.taht.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f1d17950-dba4-485e-ad48-32fed16819a3@Spark>
Nearly any form of backhaul can work, failover. tailscale
seems trustworthy. 900Mhz or lower radios have more range,
lowra also.
On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 03:25:13PM +0100, Mike Puchol wrote:
> There seems to be some confusion on this one - the drones are not capable of directly using Starlink. The drone’s short to medium range air-to-ground data & video link can be relayed by the drone’s local controller to a command post over a Starlink internet connection. The command post could also be using Starlink, but the scenario looks like this:
>
>
> The drone is presumed to be remote and only having Starlink as the uplink towards the command post. The command post could be in a position to be served by fiber, and use Starlink as a backup (or vice-versa). I have assumed the drone’s data link works at 5 GHz, but it could be on any band.
>
> Best,
>
> Mike
> On Mar 20, 2022, 12:15 +0100, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, wrote:
> > https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10630625/Elon-Musks-internet-allowing-Ukrainian-drones-pound-Putins-helpless-tanks.html
> >
> > --
> > I tried to build a better future, a few times:
> > https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icei.org
> >
> > Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
> > _______________________________________________
> > Starlink mailing list
> > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-21 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-20 11:15 Dave Taht
2022-03-20 14:25 ` Mike Puchol
2022-03-21 21:29 ` Dave Täht [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220321212932.GA5849@mail.taht.net \
--to=davet@teklibre.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=mike@starlink.sx \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox