From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Dave Taht <davet@teklibre.net>, starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] routing capability in starlinks
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 10:43:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20487.1625064183@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ACB8EDAE-560E-4882-B0A4-ECFA85F31219@teklibre.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1079 bytes --]
Dave Taht <davet@teklibre.net> wrote:
> going village to village on the same sat would save a ton of backhaul
> bandwidth and offer less latency for things like phone calls. The CGN
> (dang it) looks doomed to backhaul somewhere, but perhaps the ipv6
> stuff?
As well as resiliency, and perhaps legal protection against NSL.
> I imagine they do it at the l2 protocol and program the next hop(s) on
> the ground, but we do live in an age where everything is centralized
"Simpler than IPv6" is all we ever got.
I think that it's MPLS or SR6 based upon some commodity fabric, with SDN to
create the paths.
> (for those that don’t know, I’ve been working on distance-vector
> routing protocols for decades, most of my work on that front for the
> last decade has been focused on making the babel routing protocol scale
> better than bgp does for meshy links )
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 487 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-30 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-30 2:00 [Starlink] 69,000 Users Daniel AJ Sokolov
2021-06-30 5:24 ` David Lang
2021-06-30 5:48 ` Dave Taht
2021-06-30 7:13 ` [Starlink] routing capability in starlinks Dave Taht
2021-06-30 14:43 ` Michael Richardson [this message]
2021-06-30 23:56 ` Nick Buraglio
2021-06-30 7:23 ` [Starlink] 69,000 Users Mike Puchol
2021-06-30 7:30 ` David Lang
2021-06-30 7:43 ` Mike Puchol
2021-06-30 7:51 ` Dave Taht
2021-06-30 9:57 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2021-06-30 14:24 ` Dave Taht
2021-06-30 18:33 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2021-06-30 20:40 ` Dick Roy
2021-06-30 23:33 ` Daniel AJ Sokolov
2021-07-01 0:00 ` David Lang
2021-07-01 0:03 ` Daniel AJ Sokolov
2021-07-01 0:20 ` David Lang
2021-06-30 10:53 ` Jared Mauch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20487.1625064183@localhost \
--to=mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca \
--cc=davet@teklibre.net \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox