Thank you Dave! It has been a while since I wrote that piece, and so much has changed. I have been really busy with work, and haven’t been able to implement a lot of these changes into the starlink.sx tracker - I’m trying to put aside some time to update it. The following I can think of: • v2mini satellites are not modeled, and are now a great portion of the constellation. • Gateways now have Ka and E band capability, increasing backhaul capacity considerably (5 GHz available on E band). • Several megasites have been constructed (32 gateway antennas per site). • Additional Ku beams are available on v2mini satellites. • ISL is a complete mesh now, with very few gaps. • DTC onboard newer v2mini satellites. • Reduced operational altitude on some shells, enabling more frequency re-use, and 3-4 dB better link margin. • New versions of the UT, with Mini being the equivalent of 802.11b Wi-Fi clients ruining the party for G/N clients by dragging down resources. Best, Mike On Jan 14, 2025 at 14:24 -0800, Dave Taht via Starlink , wrote: > https://mikepuchol.com/modeling-starlink-capacity-843b2387f501 > > It has a few challengeable assumptions now. > > -- > Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink