From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vsmx002.dclux.xion.oxcs.net (vsmx002.dclux.xion.oxcs.net [185.74.65.108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A325C3B29D for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 02:36:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from proxy-10.proxy.shared.ns.xion.oxcs.net (proxy-10.proxy.shared.ns.xion.oxcs.net [47.159.135.180]) by mx-out.dclux.xion.oxcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 18482A60AC4 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 07:36:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dclux.xion.oxcs.net; s=mail1; t=1737444967; bh=6P5zOjhrCrXgLKHC4UomUPIxfnXJ6UB9p5zrN2MvcAg=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=LvQ5eh5RnCoRnqNx0ZFCGEgAjWZxyHOM9vXWBoMkFWP87Ejw+cU7pN2owdxh284vm 2y5xUvAFP02dS2CZP4fj0V0WEOIRYyGFrVrPY0RqbBUcCg4S8FGlpMQ2GarkhYAbpx d1hHAYDsdGcGg6DQAMNyED7mW4rrM0IHxjKx0F7/1S0jPNB02xgC+YsK/4TeSU2nyY 4RrYK06x8NjePMpURwytBlS681fZJnaNzCXHNPRzpMn3EZA9l/3UWS1OjsS9laF27C 5R4yRPHU6mZ9L1yadqM1ZUJ2DrO7LHJoRUHy+kzgXPrnp2h+WVM0D8HEbHOKFUZ7y+ dgLWXxd9Wf6Og== Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 23:35:50 -0800 From: Mike Puchol To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net Message-ID: <23793652-9a55-4976-a641-a614cb9f6c96@Spark> In-Reply-To: References: X-Readdle-Message-ID: 23793652-9a55-4976-a641-a614cb9f6c96@Spark MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="678f4e63_6ff13a72_174ec" X-VadeSecure-Status: LEGIT X-VADE-STATUS: LEGIT Subject: Re: [Starlink] I had forgotten how good this was X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 07:36:08 -0000 --678f4e63_6ff13a72_174ec Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Thank you Dave=21 It has been a while since I wrote that piece, and so much has changed. I = have been really busy with work, and haven=E2=80=99t been able to impleme= nt a lot of these changes into the starlink.sx tracker - I=E2=80=99m tryi= ng to put aside some time to update it. The following I can think of: =E2=80=A2 v2mini satellites are not modeled, and are now a great portion = of the constellation. =E2=80=A2 Gateways now have Ka and E band capability, increasing backhaul= capacity considerably (5 GHz available on E band). =E2=80=A2 Several megasites have been constructed (32 gateway antennas pe= r site). =E2=80=A2 Additional Ku beams are available on v2mini satellites. =E2=80=A2 ISL is a complete mesh now, with very few gaps. =E2=80=A2 DTC onboard newer v2mini satellites. =E2=80=A2 Reduced operational altitude on some shells, enabling more freq= uency re-use, and 3-4 dB better link margin. =E2=80=A2 New versions of the UT, with Mini being the equivalent of 802.1= 1b Wi-=46i clients ruining the party for G/N clients by dragging down res= ources. Best, Mike On Jan 14, 2025 at 14:24 -0800, Dave Taht via Starlink , wrote: > https://mikepuchol.com/modeling-starlink-capacity-843b2387f501 > > It has a few challengeable assumptions now. > > -- > Dave T=C3=A4ht CSO, LibreQos > =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F > Starlink mailing list > Starlink=40lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink --678f4e63_6ff13a72_174ec Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
Thank you Dave=21&=23160;

It has been a while since I wrote that piece, and so much has changed. I = have been really busy with work, and haven=E2=80=99t been able to impleme= nt a lot of these changes into the starlink.sx tracker - I=E2=80=99m tryi= ng to put aside some time to update it.

The following I can think of:
  • v2mini satellites are not modeled, and are now a great portion of the= constellation.
  • Gateways now have Ka and E band capability, increasing backhaul capac= ity considerably (5 GHz available on E band).
  • Several megasites have been constructed (32 gateway antennas per site= ).
  • Additional Ku beams are available on v2mini satellites.
  • ISL is a complete mesh now, with very few gaps.
  • DTC onboard newer v2mini satellites.
  • Reduced operational altitude on some shells, enabling more frequency = re-use, and 3-4 dB better link margin.
  • New versions of the UT, with Mini being the equivalent of 802.11b Wi-= =46i clients ruining the party for G/N clients by dragging down resources= .


Best,

Mike
On Jan 14, 2025 at 14:24 -0800, Dav= e Taht via Starlink <starlink=40lists.bufferbloat.net>, wrote:
https://mikepuchol.com/modeling-starlink-capacity-843b2387f501<= br />
It has a few challengeable assumptions now.

--
Dave T=C3=A4ht CSO, LibreQos
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F
Starlink mailing list
Starlink=40lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
--678f4e63_6ff13a72_174ec--